Search for: "Justice v. Michaels et al" Results 541 - 560 of 581
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2008, 7:09 am
Peters, et al., Judge Michael Davis allowed to stand a lawsuit concerning the bridge near Oak Park Heights that would cross the Lower St. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
, Global Global - General Candidates for post of WIPO Director General present their platforms: (WIPO), IP is not a thing: (Dilanchian), FOSS adoption and consumer welfare: (IPcentral) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Manufacturers becoming brand licensing companies: (IP ThinkTank), Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement moves forward: (Michael Geist) Global - Patents Office Open XML voted to become official standard, so out of Microsoft’s… [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 5:32 am
[N]o argument about what he did or didn't facilitate, or about his special obligations as an attorney, makes his conduct morally equivalent to that of his nominal clients, Secretary Rumsfeld, et al., or comparable to the conduct of interrogators distant in time, rank and place. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 1:10 pm
Those are the provisions at issue in the case  now awaiting the Supreme Court’s action — Defenders of Wildlife, et al., v. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 4:17 am
Rees [www.law.berkeley.edu] Supreme Court Briefs Party Briefs Brief for Petitioners Brief for Respondents Reply Brief for Petitioners Amicus Briefs Amicus Briefs Filed in Support of Petitioners Brief for Michael Morales, Michael Taylor, et al. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
: (Public Knowledge), WIPO Copyright Committee 16th session to discuss Broadcast Treaty, new proposal for exceptions and limitations agreement: (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (IPwar’s), (Intellectual Property Watch), (KEI), (Public Knowledge), (IP Justice), (IP Justice), (KEI), (KEI), (KEI), (WIPO), ‘Year of filters’ turning into year of lawsuits against ISPs –… [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 11:07 am
Here are some excerpts: Michael Maroko, of Allred, Maroko and Goldberg, representing gay couple Tyler et al, : ??? [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at [duncanbucknell.com]Highlights this week included:EU wants 95 year copyright on recordings: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Intellectual Property Watch), (IP Law360),Harvard Arts and Sciences Faculty decides to allow open access to research: (Techdirt), (Michael Geist), (Ars Technica), (Against Monopoly),Summary judgment hearing 8 Feb: Tafas & GSK v Dudas concerning implementation of the USPTO’s… [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
: (Michael Geist),Prentice backtracks on Treaty Policy: (Michael Geist),Microsoft misleads o [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
Wilhem von Leeb et al., Judgment, XI Trials of War Criminals before the Nuernberg Military Tribunals 690-95, while Schlegelberger's is in the better-known Justice Case.)This may sound like ancient history, but it seems significant that in the past the U.S. threw the book at government lawyers for conduct that is awfully close to the allegations in this lawsuit.3. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
He provides analysis and insight into the workings of the criminal justice system but, he too, is able to enjoy a moment away from serious criminality. [read post]
22 Dec 2007, 7:31 am
Consequently, with the exception of its ruling on the fee litigation issue, the district court's decision is AFFIRMED. 07a0491p.06 2007/12/18 Beattie, et al v. [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 3:40 pm
Kennedy, Jr., in District Court in Washington in the case of Abdah, et al., v. [read post]