Search for: "Kay v. Kay"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,011
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2012, 1:08 pm
By Rhonda Kay, Partner, Gair Gair Conason Steigman Mackauf Bloom & Rubinowitz; In Edwards v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 10:40 am
The judges (Lords Justices Maurice Kay, Stanley Brunton -- who gave the leading judgment -- and Lewison) were not persuaded that the Bolkiah rule was of broad application beyond solicitors. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 12:11 am
In its June 2010 decision in the Morrison v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 10:17 am
Panel 2—U.S. and EU Perspectives on Trademark and Design Law in the Next Decade Annette Kur, Senior Research Fellow, Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law; Associate Professor, Stockholm University Two regimes coexisting at the community level and harmonized national law; both regimes are interlinked in terms of prior rights in one creating barriers to rights in another. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm
Perhaps the most rigorous defender of the original intentions version of originalism has been Richard Kay in a series of very careful articles. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 12:37 pm
One promising framework for reform could be Senator Kay Hagan’s Transforming the Regulatory Environment to Accelerate Access to Treatments (TREAT) Act. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 3:56 am
On 1 February 2012, in their judgment in the case of Coogan and Phillips v NGN and Mulcaire ([2012] EWCA Civ 48) the Court of Appeal (Lord Judge, Lord Neuberger and Maurice Kay LJ) unanimously upheld the rulings of Mann J and Vos J that, as a result of the operation of section 72 of the Senior Courts Act 1981, Mr Mulcaire was not entitled to rely on his privilege against self-incrimination in refusing to answer questions put to him by the two claimants. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am
Newly resolved cases include: Nathaniel Rothschild v The Observer (Clause 1) 10/02/2012; A man v Grimsby Evening Telegraph (Clause 1) 08/02/2012; A woman v Hinckley Times (Clause 1) 08/02/2012; Ellen Yianni v Daily Mail (Clause 1) 08/02/2012; Nathalie Dye v Daily Mail (Clause 1 and 5) 08/02/2012; Nathalie Dye v The Sun (Clause 1 and 5) 08/02/2012. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:39 am
Therefore, the MR concluded (at para 83): Accordingly, I would dismiss these appeals, as: i) Much of the information on the voicemail messages of the claimants which have been intercepted by Mr Mulcaire is likely to have been 'commercial information or other intellectual property' within section 72(5); ii) Although some of the information was not 'commercial information or other intellectual property', and, in Ms Phillips's case, the confidence may have been that of her… [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 6:32 pm
In Roper v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 8:30 am
The Justice was predeceased by his parents Don and Kay, and beloved brother Sean and sister-in law Janice. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 1:19 am
The Court (Lord Judge, Lord Neuberger and Maurice Kay LJ) unanimously upheld the rulings of Mann J and Vos J that, as a result of the operation of section 72 of the Senior Courts Act 1981, Mr Mulcaire was not entitled to rely on his privilege against self-incrimination (‘PSI’).” Full story UK Human Rights Blog, 1st February 2012 Source: www.ukhumanrightsblog.com [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:41 am
Coogan and Philips v News Group Newspapers [2012] EWCA Civ 48 -read judgment The Court of Appeal today dismissed Mr Glenn Mulcaire’s appeal against an order that he provide information to claimants in the phone hacking litigation. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:18 am
The Court (Lord Judge, Lord Neuberger and Maurice Kay LJ) unanimously upheld the rulings of Mann J and Vos J that, as a result of the operation of section 72 of the Senior Courts Act 1981, Mr Mulcaire was not entitled to rely on his privilege against self-incrimination (“PSI”). [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 8:36 pm
The oldest of 6 children, she was born May 18, 1949 in Denver, CO to Elwood V. and Maxine R. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 3:44 am
Kay v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
There are no adjudicated PCC complaints to report but resolved complaints include: Sally Low v The Independent, Clause 1, 27/01/2012; Mr Syed Ahmad v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; Mr Colin Philip v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; David Bret v The Sun, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; Mr Damien Collis v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/01/2012, Mr Peter Reynolds v Lancashire Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/01/2012 Karen Birch v Oldham Evening… [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 11:34 am
In Vasquez v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 7:14 am
Welchel v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:24 pm
Harvie Wilkinson penned the opinion for the unanimous panel, which also included Judge Diana Gribbon Motz and Judge Allyson Kay Duncan. [read post]
