Search for: "King v. State" Results 541 - 560 of 6,138
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2022, 5:13 am by Eugene Volokh
Indeed, similar rules apply in many states to private schools more generally; if a state bans discrimination in admission by such schools, which many states do, that brings with it similar restrictions on speech that creates a "hostile environment" (which would likely violate the First Amendment when applied to curriculum, see Runyon v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 10:47 pm by Josh Blackman
See, e.g., Brown & Williamson, (drug agency regulating tobacco); King v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
Further, as noted in Royal Communications Consultants Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 6:16 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Following the Supreme Court decision to overturn the landmark Roe v. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 6:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Bruen, and the tech and privacy implications of Dobbs v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:54 am by ernst
McConnell, The President Who Would Not Be King 326–335 (2020); A. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 12:41 pm
It is  hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 1:39 pm by Benjamin Pollard
Yang Liu and Brandon Vines discussed the impact of Louisiana v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 10:50 am by Thorsten Bausch (Hoffmann Eitle)
Having financed the rise of Maximilian I, Jakob Fugger made considerable contributions to secure the election of the Spanish king Charles I to become Holy Roman Emperor Charles V. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 10:17 am by IntLawGrrls
Philippa Webb Professor of Public International Law and Director of the Centre for International Governance and Dispute Resolution (CIGAD) at King’s College London. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am by admin
The Bradford Hill Predicate: Ruling Out Random and Systematic Error In two recent posts, I spent some time discussing a recent law review, which had some important things to say about specific causation.[1] One of several points from which I dissented was the article’s argument that Sir Austin Bradford Hill had not made explicit that ruling out random and systematic error was required before assessing his nine “viewpoints” on whether an association was causal. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 10:50 am
It is  hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]