Search for: "LITTLE v. SUPERIOR COURT" Results 541 - 560 of 2,092
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2012, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Superior Court, 51 Cal. 4th 310, 322-24 (2011) (requiring economic harm to prove UCL standing). [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 5:29 pm
Troup landed in San Francisco Superior Court about two weeks later, on Nov. 12. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 10:35 pm
Thus, Illinois courts may declare adhesion contracts unlawful where the party in the superior bargaining position has taken unfair advantage of the adherer by making the desired product or service available only if the weaker party accedes to the form of the contract. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 2:11 pm by Howard Knopf
However, it should be noted that that the Board’s “correctness” niche carved out by the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) pre-Vavilov wherein some issues arise both in tariff hearings and in infringement proceedings in the superior Courts may one day now be revisited as to whether this is still “good law”. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 6:45 pm
  The Court then notes that various Superior Court cases have also followed this rule. [read post]