Search for: "Large v. State" Results 541 - 560 of 28,508
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2016, 9:25 am by Kate Fort
Remedy Brief The four Defendants in this action are largely ignoring this Court’s summary judgment ruling of March 30, 2015, Oglala Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 2:27 pm by Eric M. Fraser
Electrical lines along a Salt River Project canal The Supreme Court was set to hear argument on March 19 in Salt River Project v. [read post]
5 May 2007, 5:47 pm
It's true, of course, that there are other ways men can have sex with fertile women without incurring a large risk of fatherhood. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 2:50 am
Code is the codification by subject matter of the general and permanent laws of the United States, based on what is printed in the Statutes at Large. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am by Blog  Editorial
Eadie said court should not have a situation where they would reach different outcome on HC or a JR when the subject matter is largely the same. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 6:50 pm by admin
Some of the key holdings of the Court included: First, the Court largely, but not completely, adopted the Supreme Court of Canada’s recent articulation of the appropriate consumer for misleading advertising claims (albeit in that case, Richard v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 5:22 pm
See, e.g., American Libraries Ass'n. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 1:47 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Supreme Court of Canada released a decision this week in Hryniak v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:00 am by Matthew Campbell
On June 8, 2023, the Supreme Court of the United States in Allen v Milligan upheld the lower court’s determination that the newly adopted Alabama congressional maps likely violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 2:56 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The proceedings were stayed largely because Mr Gohil charged with serious money-laundering and convicted and sentenced to prison in 2011, but finally in Sep 2012 Moylan J decided to set aside the order on the basis that there had been material non-disclosure, if Mr Gohil had made full disclosure the outcome would have been different, and because Mrs Gohil had satisfied the evidence criteria is Ladd v Marshall. [read post]
Sheetz’s challenge faced setbacks in state court, largely due to the application of precedent set by the California Supreme Court in San Remo Hotel v. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm by Marty Lederman
 The sixteen posts in that symposium focused almost exclusively on whether the Secretary has the statutory discretion to defer removal for the large class of persons in question. [read post]