Search for: "Law v. United States"
Results 541 - 560
of 62,738
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 11:49 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:00 am
Article V bars extradition when the person sought has been convicted or acquitted in the Requested State for the same offense, but does not bar extradition if the competent authorities in the Requested State have declined to prosecute for the acts for which extradition has been requested. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:13 am
The United States Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal from Louisiana in the case of Barbour v. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 9:28 pm
United States. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:44 am
On January 23, 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 10:17 am
United States, ___ A.3d ___ (2013), a recent case dealing with the required mental state for unlawful entry. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 3:49 pm
United States District Court (In re United States), 791 F.3d 945 (9th Cir. 2015). [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 10:33 am
Lochner v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 9:12 am
United States wasn’t really in doubt. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 12:15 pm
In Nitro-Lift Techs. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:00 am
The FTCA operates based on the state law in which the injury occurred. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 12:50 am
Rev. ___ (2014): Depending on one’s religious and political proclivities, the United States Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 6:14 pm
They will also explore broader legal and policy issues impacting asylum seekers and refugees in the United States, including those fleeing the crisis in Ukraine. [read post]
31 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Article V concerns capital punishment. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 11:49 pm
Caroline Bettinger-Lopez (Columbia Law School) has posted Jessica Gonzales v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 7:50 am
This term, the United States Supreme Court will hear arguments in the case of Gould v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:14 am
Regina (A) v Secretary of State for Health Court of Appeal “A failed asylum seeker was not ordinarily resident in the United Kingdom so as to be entitled to free treatment by the National Health Service. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 2:34 am
Hussain (Zakir) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “Evasion of immigration controls for a long time was not in itself a reason for deciding that an applicant, unlawfully in the United Kingdom, should not be allowed to stay. [read post]
12 May 2016, 12:30 pm
On April 18, 2016, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments inUnited States v. [read post]
