Search for: "Lee v. LEE" Results 541 - 560 of 7,957
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2023, 11:07 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Murphy, Peremptory Norms of General International Law (Jus Cogens) (Revisited) and Other Topics: The Seventy-Third Session of the International Law Commission International DecisionsJaemin Lee, Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:45 pm by John A. Emmons
Emma Svoboda outlined the issues at hand in Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 11:58 am by Christopher J. Walker
Lee Liberman Otis Luncheon Debate: Resolved: The Major Questions Doctrine Has No Place in Statutory Interpretation In West Virginia v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:00 am by Marc DeGirolami
Knight First Amendment Institute (2021) (Thomas, J., concurring) Lee C. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 5:53 am by Mary B. McCord
” North Carolina militia leader Michael Lee Wells testified that Three Percenter group chats included calls to start “taking out” civilians in Democratic areas, as the “only way to stop the rioting. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Federation and Secession, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Fraley, Washington and Lee University School of Law, has published History of U.S. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am by Derek T. Muller
For those who stand to gain the most:POTENTIAL WINNERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Texas A&M (90 v. 46)Arizona (77 v. 45)George Mason (54 v. 30)BYU (43 v. 23)Arizona State (49 v. 30)Alabama (43 v. 25)Utah (54 v. 37)Maryland (64 v. 47)Boston University (28 v. 17)And who are likely to be adversely affected the most:POTENTIAL LOSERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Boston College (24 v. 37)Washington & Lee (24… [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am by Derek T. Muller
For those who stand to gain the most:POTENTIAL WINNERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Texas A&M (90 v. 46)Arizona (77 v. 45)George Mason (54 v. 30)BYU (43 v. 23)Arizona State (49 v. 30)Alabama (43 v. 25)Utah (54 v. 37)Maryland (64 v. 47)Boston University (28 v. 17)And who are likely to be adversely affected the most:POTENTIAL LOSERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Boston College (24 v. 37)Washington & Lee (24… [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 12:40 am by Frank Cranmer
Lee v United Kingdom [2022] ECHR Application no. 18860/19: The Supreme Court had upheld the refusal of Ashers Baking, on religious/moral grounds, to supply a cake to Mr Lee decorated with a colour picture of the Sesame Street characters Bert and Ernie with the caption, “Support Gay Marriage”, and he challenged that decision at Strasbourg, on the grounds that it violated his Convention rights under Articles 8, 9, 10 and 14. [read post]