Search for: "Lee v. State"
Results 541 - 560
of 4,590
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2020, 4:54 am
*Lee v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 5:59 pm
In Karen Lee v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 5:38 am
In a recent episode of The Modern Law Library podcast, the ABA Journal’s Lee Rawles spoke with litigator Paul Golden about his new book, Litigating Adverse Possession Cases: Pirates v. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 7:07 am
Lee, issued on June 11. [read post]
30 May 2008, 6:19 am
Yesterday's oral arguments before the Supreme Court in the direct appeal case of Roy Lee Ward v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 9:38 pm
Lee, No. 2013-1628 (Fed. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:07 pm
Lyle reported on the decisions in Fisher and United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 4:19 am
Plaquemines Parish, et al v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 12:20 pm
And it's not exactly possible for someone in Guam to get in a car and drive to another state that allows abortions.The Ninth Circuit panel here consists of Judges Bea, Collins and Lee; appointees of President Bush, Trump and Trump (respectively).Not exactly the greatest draw for the plaintiffs, eh? [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 2:23 pm
Lee, 52 M.J. 51, 53 (C.A.A.F. 1999), in light of Strickland v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 11:52 am
(Orin Kerr) Today’s news that Paul Clement is leaving King & Spaulding over his defense of DOMA reminds me of one of the big stories among Harvard Law students when I was a student there back in the mid-1990s: The boycott of Sidley & Austin for its representation of the state of Colorado in Romer v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 6:12 pm
(See United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 12:00 am
U.S. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 1:28 pm
The F/V JUDA LEE was approximately 7 miles off the coast of Nome, Alaska when the incident occurred. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 1:45 pm
SAS Institute, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 8:36 am
Eddie Lee Howard. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:24 am
In Marbury v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 12:39 pm
On February 20, 2008, the Court unanimously affirmed the First Circuit decision in Rowe v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:15 am
This was because, although the appellants had appealed to the Court of Appeal by way of case stated, they were entitled to appeal to the Supreme Court in relation to the 1988 Order because the decision involved a question as to the validity of measures of the Northern Ireland Assembly. [read post]
