Search for: "Legall v. State"
Results 541 - 560
of 88,013
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2006, 6:12 am
This week's New Jersey Legal Update podcast will discuss the October 25, 2006 landmark decision of Lewis v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 12:59 pm
In the case of Ball State University v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 1:02 pm
In March 2019, three Texas lawyers sued the State Bar of Texas claiming that under Janus v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 3:03 am
Wachtler v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:06 am
Defendants’ objections to legal charges in these letters do not preclude plaintiffs account stated claim as they were made past a reasonable time to object to the account. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 5:04 am
” To state a cause of action for legal malpractice, in addition to an attorney-clientrelationship, the complaint must set forth “the negligence of the attorney; that the negligence was the proximate cause of the loss sustained; and actual damages” (Leder v Spiegel, 31 AD3d 266 [1st Dept 2006]). [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 8:06 pm
See US ex rel Oberg v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:02 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 4:34 pm
Hamdan v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 6:50 am
Martinet Legal Society of New Orleans and the A.P. [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 11:05 am
Absent the case of Mapp v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:10 pm
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Trinchi, 2019 ONCA 356 R v Trinchi is the most recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in a string of cases related to the offence of voyeurism under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code (see our previous post on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Jarvis). [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 9:04 am
<> Sierra Club v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 5:26 pm
State, 363 Md. 483, 769 A.2d 879 (2001) establishes parameters for whether police officers have probable cause to legally stop the driver. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down judgment in TN, MA and AA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 40, in which the Court held that a breach of the family tracing duty in Regulation 6 of the Asylum Seekers (Reception Conditions) Regulations 2005 does not affect the rule in Ravichandran requiring asylum applications to be decided on the facts existing at the date of decision. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 6:33 am
State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:11 am
Non-citizens may be able to avoid deportation if they have lived in the United States for at least seven years and have been lawful permanent residents for at least five years. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 10:30 am
In any case, the lawsuit predictably fails on its lack of legal merits. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 4:01 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has affirmed a summary judgment for an attorney in a legal malpractice action. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 2:05 pm
In an opinion delivered by Justice Ginsburg, the Court held by a vote of 6-3 that the legal regime in force at the time of Vartelas’ conviction governs whether he may reenter the United States after traveling abroad, not the retroactive application of a statute passed after the date of his conviction. [read post]
