Search for: "Leisure v. Leisure"
Results 541 - 560
of 672
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2011, 2:54 am
(Excess Copyright) Ontario Court of Appeal opines on technology licences in receivership case: Canrock Ventures LLC v. [read post]
7 May 2011, 5:56 am
There is typically a leisure/wor [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:40 pm
This includes coverage of the law school's recent seminar, chaired by Sir Robin Jacob, on the controversial ECJ rulings in FA Premier League v QC Leisure and Murphy v Media Protection Services (noted by the IPKat here). [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 7:15 am
This statement is puzzling, given GATT Article XXIV and GATS Article V, which allow countries to negotiate bilateral or regional trade agreements. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 9:53 am
Beery, Deputy JUDGE PENDLETON GAINES FILED: 07/21/2006 PHYSICIANS CHOICE OF ARIZONA INC. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 9:17 am
V. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
: Patent bar, doctors face off in Prometheus v Mayo (The Prior Art) US Copyright Rights owners taking on small victims – Warner Music vs ‘Keyboard Cat’ YouTube clip; DC Comics vs John Stacks over figurines; Frank Gaylord vs postal service over art image on stamps (1709 Copyright Blog) US Copyright – Decisions District Court Colorado: Republishing third party rankings in marketing material might be copyright/trade mark… [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 1:15 am
Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Lonsdale Australia Limited [2012] FCAFC 130 Société Anonyme des Manujactures de Glaces v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 9:13 am
” Baures v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:02 am
James v. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 4:07 am
She turned right, west, on the dock and began a leisurely stroll. [read post]
12 May 2023, 3:00 am
The functionality or ideas that lie behind the code is protected (SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1482 at §20-§37). [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 3:46 am
And, for those who missed the television event, it’s available via NBC.com for viewing at your leisure. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 12:32 pm
Having an ongoing, working draft of a set of interrogatory answers would eliminate saving a string of documents ranging from "ints - client", "ints - revised", "ints - revised 2," and "ints - revised 2, final v.3", etc.While these scenarios would be remarkable timesavers, there are still many clients who don't even use e-mail. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 8:54 pm
They are the co-authors of Red Families v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 6:43 am
The New Jersey Supreme Court has noted that Sec. 7.2 appeared to require proof that the strain of the work effort that allegedly precipitated the worker’s disability or death from coronary disease was qualitatively more intense than the strain of the physical activity to which the worker was accustomed in his leisure time. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 10:29 pm
In last week’s case (Carr v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:58 pm
Many of us are at leisure not to take every case that comes in the door. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 3:51 pm
In today’s case (MacIntyre v. [read post]
