Search for: "Lemley v. Lemley"
Results 541 - 560
of 568
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2011, 11:26 am
Might work better if claims were confined to copyright v. patent w/r/t software? [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 2:47 pm
He's emotionally on the side of Lemley & Dogan, but ultimately trademark use reduces to confusion - do consumers understand something as an indication of source? [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 9:12 am
(He also thinks that confusion over authorization shouldn’t generally matter; see his & Lemley and my work on materiality.) [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 11:37 am
Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:47 am
Spann v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 8:32 am
[Also interestingly, this framework would be consistent with Mark Lemley’s argument that having—and thus allowing/not policing against—parodies should be a requirement for fame, which would turn into media coverage rather than competition.]RT: This is a legal question: the doctrine right now requires none of this, because the theory is always if there is consumer confusion then there is something protectable. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 3:02 pm
Co. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 10:25 am
Different question about length v. breadth while in place. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 9:25 am
If we are going to talk about patents v. copyrights, across the board motivations are the same for sciences and expressive arts. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 2:37 pm
CTRL-C and CTRL-V are considered sacred symbols. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Court reconsidering baseless ‘making available’ theory in file-sharing case Capitol Records v Jammie Thomas; amicus briefs from, MPAA, PFF: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Electronic Fontier Foundation), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Patry Copyright Blog) ICANN approves rules allowing brands to be… [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:45 am
Anything v. a Fortune 500 company = fair use less likely. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am
If you have been following the machinations by the Obama Justice Department [sic] over amending the ASCAP and BMI consent decrees, you may have found yourself wondering who was responsible for rejecting the good faith efforts of the songwriting community in favor of a cynical back room deal with multinational tech companies and broadcasters. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 5:02 pm
Abishek Nagaraj: Good job of studying IP free zones v. struggles. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 5:25 am
" There were no barriers in US TM law, because of decisions like 1968's Chanel v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 1:21 pm
Robert Bone – Notice Failure and Defenses in Trademark Law Bone’s basic argument: Principal notice issue in TM is uncertainty about scope, and principal problem is chilling effects. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 4:00 am
” Mark Lemley, Is the Sky Falling on the Content Industries? [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 1:01 pm
In Rogers v. [read post]
