Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 541 - 560
of 21,031
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2010, 7:16 am
The defendant was unsuccessful and was found to be liable for the plaintiff's injuries. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
The jury found defendant liable and awarded $1 billion in statutory damages. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 9:05 am
In this case, the summons and complaint were served on the defendant’s father, and his name was listed on the summons. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
To establish liability, a plaintiff must first show that the defendant had a duty to protect against the plaintiff’s injury. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 8:51 am
The court’s analysis appears to hint that, had the forklift been equipped with a back-up alarm that had malfunctioned before the defendant inspected it, the defendant may be liable if it failed to fix the broken alarm. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 10:29 pm
In this case, the court declined to dismiss the individual defendant from the lawsuit. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 6:25 am
While Defendant Paliath was found responsible for other damages, the court found Broker-Defendant Home Town Realty liable for the 135K, based on the Broker’s vicarious liability for Paliath’s actions in connection with Auer’s purchase of several properties listed by the Broker. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 3:56 am
Norris was ultimately the only defendant in the case. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:00 am
An Illinois jury evaluated a bicycle accident lawsuit to determine not only whether the defendant driver was liable, but also whether her employer was liable in Cedric Bacon v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Virgin Islands, held that a union could be liable under the federal Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:10 am
Under the respondeat superior theory, a company can be liable for its drivers’ negligence when the driver is operating the employer’s truck on a scheduled delivery route at a scheduled time in some manner as to further the employer’s business. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 9:48 am
The court found that despite the defendants’ argument that they had insufficient notice of the plaintiffs’ trespass claims, the plaintiffs’ actual, open, and notorious use of the land should have put any observer, including the record title owner, on notice of the adverse possession and the possessor’s accompanying property rights. [read post]
8 May 2017, 12:43 pm
” Similarly, in CoStar, the Fourth Circuit found the defendant ISP not liable for direct copyright infringement based on its subscribers’ posting of copyrighted photographs on its website. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 4:00 am
This decision addresses whether and when hospital staff members may be considered to be acting as "officials" or "policymakers" of the hospital at which they are employed so that their conduct may be attributed to the hospital and thereby establish a Plaintiff’s right to damages on the ground that the defendant hospital was "deliberately indifferent" to a violation of the federal Rehabilitation Act [RA], 87 Stat. 355. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 11:57 am
As a result, the court determined that using a rope swing is an outdoor recreational activity, and the defendant was entitled to recreational use immunity. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 8:33 pm
Plaintiff's lawyers have pushed a failure to warn theory to make manufacturers liable for another defendant's asbestos-containing products especially if that other defendant's asbestos-containing product is a replacement part. [read post]
10 May 2012, 7:48 am
The Defendant was found liable and ordered to pay over $65,000 in damages including punitive damages. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 11:09 pm
A defendant that denies liability when it is clearly liable can outrage a jury enough to award more damages than a plaintiff hoped for, but a defendant that admits liability not only diffuses that risk, but also paints itself as being reasonable and fair. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 6:20 am
The plaintiff and his wife went to the defendant’s store to do their grocery shopping. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 10:23 am
Resnick, 08-4039 (7th Cir. 2010) This case presents issues arising from the government's efforts to collect a criminal defendant's financial obligations to the government from a third party who received money from the insolvent defendant. [read post]
