Search for: "Light v. Light" Results 541 - 560 of 41,681
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2024, 11:00 pm
” And since none of those elements applied here, the appellate court was of the view that dismissal was appropriate, particularly since Lessing's wasn’t alleged to have been responsible for the condition in question.Bet Lessing's was more than pleased ….# # #DECISIONE. v County of Suffolk [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 9:13 pm by Patent Docs
In light of the Office's promulgation of Guidance to the examining corps as well as PTAB judges of the "increased flexibility" in obviousness determinations mandated by the Supreme Court's decision in KSR v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:25 pm by Xandra Kramer
This is admittedly a setback for the collective protection of privacy rights, notably similar to the one following the 2021 United Kingdom Supreme Court ruling in Lloyd v Google. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm by admin
Plaintiffs’ counsel typically argued that Federal Rule of Evidence 704, which declared that “[a]n opinion is not objectionable just because it embraces an ultimate issue,” green lighted their witnesses’ amateur or professional psychoanalysis. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 8:21 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit handed down a mixed decision in Chewy, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 8:18 am by Unreported Opinions
Walter Corson is a unit owner in the condominium regime, owning a lift well adjacent to […] The post PINEY NARROWS YACHT HAVEN CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:13 am by Rudyuk Law Firm
In light of these changes, the court questioned the continued viability of the restrictions outlined in Kahn v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 12:23 pm by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch In January 2024 a then-secret order from US Customs and Border Protection (CPB) had a major impact in the Masimo v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 7:01 am by Stephanie Ellis
For the most part, this uptick in activity has had to do with the requirement that all applicants prove they are socially disadvantaged in light of the the Ultima decision that we’ve discussed on the blog. [read post]