Search for: "Line v. Line"
Results 541 - 560
of 45,294
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
These scenarios coalesced in a recent decision from the North Carolina Supreme Court: Surgeon v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
See Montgomery v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 12:16 am
Prior to the reform, it would have been in line with the Libertel judgment to file only a digital colour sample or indicate a colour code of an internationally accepted colour system. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 11:41 pm
Atari Interactive v. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 9:52 am
See Graham v. [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 2:49 pm
Part V concludes. [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 12:41 pm
These citations persuade me that the general rule seems to be that non-human entities that are state actors seem to be covered by the anti-libel principle, and so Eugene is probably right about the bottom line. [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 9:54 am
But I wanted to draw attention to… Continue reading The post Federal court relies on Cook v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
In 2016 the United States Government published its first National Action Plan on Responsible Business Conduct. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 3:52 pm
From U.S. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 2:45 pm
The case, Lindke v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 1:10 pm
As Justice Brandeis wrote in his canonical concurring opinion in Whitney v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 12:36 pm
Declaring the NLRB’s rationale to be “nonsense,” on March 26, 2024, a unanimous three-judge panel for the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in Stern Produce Company Inc v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 11:20 am
Hasemann v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:58 am
Steffel v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:22 am
”) [4] Frye v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 5:45 am
Thus, the declarations were not subject to the general rule of grand jury secrecy because they were not “evidence actually presented to [the grand jury]” nor “anything that may tend to reveal what transpired before it” (see United States v Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 923 F2d 241, 244 [2d Cir 1991], citing Fed Rules Crim Pro rule 6 [e] [2]). [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 4:57 am
ISRAEL-HAMAS WAR — INTERNATIONAL RESPONSE The International Court of Justice (ICJ) on Thursday issued additional provisional measures in South Africa v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 4:45 am
"] April 4, 2024 - 10 AM: RipRight, LLC v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:56 pm
For the last 50 years, EPA has buckled to pressure from the chemical industry, and basically done nothing to protect millions of Americans from breathing a life-threatening, cancer-causing chemical known as “ethylene oxide” (ETO). [read post]
