Search for: "Lloyd v. State"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,489
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2018, 4:09 pm
Surveillance Privacy International has released a report: “Teach ‘em to Phish: State Sponsors of Surveillance” reviewing the approaches of governments to providing surveillance equipment to other countries. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 6:28 am
“Precarious” was not, in their Lordships’ view, “a term of art” and was similar but not identical to the guidance imparted in Jeunesse v Netherlands (2015) 60 EHRR 17 whereby family life was rendered precarious from the outset where those “involved were aware that the immigration status of one of them was such that the persistence of that family life within the host state would from the outset be precarious. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 4:05 pm
Jeremy Wright MP has been appointed as Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport following Matt Hancock’s appointment as Health Secretary. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 9:40 am
Fourteen of the loans called for a stated interest amount; the other three did not call for any interest. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 12:30 pm
Lloyd. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 4:19 pm
On 4 July 2018, Nicklin J heard an application in the case of BVC v EWF. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 4:08 pm
The Transparency Project Blog has a post analysing the recent “civil partnership case”, R v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 5:45 am
State Farm Lloyds. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 5:45 am
State Farm Lloyds. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 7:57 am
Lord Hodge (on behalf of Lady Hale, Lord Hughes and Lord Lloyd-Jones) delivered the majority view, with only Lord Briggs dissenting. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:41 pm
Rulings IPSO has published a single resolution statement and series of rulings from the Complaints Committee: Resolution Statement 03262-18 Stein v The Herald, resolved by IPSO mediation 01724-18 Nightingale v Mail Online, no breach of the IPSO code 01108-18 Mike Ashley and Sports Direct v The Times, breach of provision 1 (Accuracy) 01066-18 Gabriel v The Sun, no breach of the IPSO code 01065-18 Gabriel v Daily Star, no breach of the IPSO code 01064-18… [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 12:35 pm
” The Lucia opinion suggests that this “continuing position” element — emphasized in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 4:16 pm
United States Summer Zervos’ defamation claim [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 11:20 am
The true scope of the elusive but all pervasive party autonomy doctrine was at the heart of the debate in the case of Rock Advertising Limited v. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:26 pm
United States Stanford&rsq [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm
United States, where the court is being asked to rule on the permissibility of the police using phone records without a warrant. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 6:04 am
The United States District Court, Northern District, Dallas Division, issued an opinion in April 2018, titled, Grand Hotel Hospitality LLC d/b/a Grand Hotel Dallas v. [read post]
28 May 2018, 4:51 pm
Since then, there has been another substantial award of A$2.623m in Rayney v State of Western Australia [2017] WASC 367 and a claim for A$4.8m made in Wagner v Harbour Radio Pty Ltd, with the trial currently being heard. [read post]
27 May 2018, 8:46 pm
IAM North America editor Richard Lloyd will moderate a roundtable discussion of attorneys from Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt; Knobbe Martens; and Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner to discuss the implications of the Supreme Court's decision in decisions in Oil States v Greene's Energy and SAS Institute v Iancu and how they will affect the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), inter partes review petitioners, and patent owners. [read post]
