Search for: "Long v. Murphy" Results 541 - 560 of 766
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
According to the Irish Independent, Murphy has been granted leave to serve a claim for damages. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 10:26 am by Nicole Huberfeld
  When Chief Justice Rehnquist authored South Dakota v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:11 am
Accordingly, I do not understand the decision of the European Court of Justice in Infopaq to have qualified the long standing test” [i.e. the very low originality standard established by University of London Press and by Ladbroke v William Hill]. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 1:19 am
 Merpel remains puzzled as to why it takes so long for the nation's top court to give its rulings. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 3:59 am by SHG
The other day, the blogversation turned to Perry v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:40 pm
This includes coverage of the law school's recent seminar, chaired by Sir Robin Jacob, on the controversial ECJ rulings in FA Premier League v QC Leisure and Murphy v Media Protection Services (noted by the IPKat here). [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 1:26 am by Melina Padron
Football Association Premier League and Others v QC Leisure and Others Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd October 4, 2011 System of licences for broadcasting football matches which grants broadcasters territorial exclusivity on a Member State basis and prohibits television viewers from watching broadcasts with decoder card in other Member States is contrary to EU law. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm by Dianne Saxe
It is not about retroactive compensation for activities that stopped long before and which were not a nuisance at the time. [read post]