Search for: "Lucas, Appeal of" Results 541 - 560 of 698
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2011, 1:06 pm by Behr, McCarter & Potter, P.C.
On appeal, the Supreme Court remanded the case for a new trial on the issue of damages only, finding that Deck had presented substantial evidence that her total medical bills represented the value of her medical treatment and that she had rebutted the presumption under Section 490.715. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 2:37 pm by Falk Metzler
In fact, the IPONZ recognised that the UK Court of Appeal considered the "solely within excluded area" criterion comparable to the "as such" criterion of Art. 52(3) EPC and ("the third step is merely an expression of the "as such" qualification; see Aerotel/Macrossan, § 45). [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 5:42 am by Jon Hyman
– from Iowa Employment Law Blog Policies, Practices and More: An FMLA “To Do” List for 2011 – from FMLA Insights 2011: Implementing the NO IDIOT RULE – from Fistful of Talent HR & Employee Relations Cleveland Cavaliers Give Homeless Man a Second Chance – from employeescreenIQ Blog Employment Background Checks: What They’re Really Looking For – from the Evil HR Lady, Suzanne Lucas … [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 12:25 am by INFORRM
We accept this was not the case and apologise to Mr Lucas. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 4:45 am by Rosalind English
(R v Lucas [1981] QB 720) The problem is that the analogy with the criminal system ends just there. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 11:21 am
However, the guidelines were appealed because the barriers might block sightlines. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:31 pm by emagraken
Lucas) the Plaintiff was injured in a 2006 BC motor vehicle collision. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 4:08 pm by Mike
Nickerson would like to dismiss his federal claims and pursue state claims of fraud and legal malpractice against the Lucas Law Firm for wrongdoing not specified in the order. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 1:46 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that ignored competent economic evidence within the Penn Central test to overturn temporary takings decisions. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 7:18 am by Sheppard Mullin
 AB 2765 only applies to dismissals where the judgment is not yet final, or where the time for filing an appeal has not yet passed. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 7:15 am
" To read the full text of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Opinion, click here. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:37 am by Lyle Denniston
  This was one of seven new appeals on which the Court asked for the views of the U.S. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 8:23 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
" There is no doubt then that the new law may impact Marei Von Saher's effort to move forward on her claim to recover Lucas Cranach the Elder's diptych "Adam and Eve" from the Norton Simon Museum, originally looted by the Nazis.Read the law at http://leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/asm/ab_2751-2800/ab_2765_bill_20100930_chaptered.htmlwww.culturalheritagelawyer.com [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 10:22 am by Steve Hall
The court rejected appeals later that night. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:38 am by Pace Law Library
The Fifth Circuit “SLAPPs” back: immediate appeal of anti-SLAPP motions under the collateral order doctrine in ... [read post]