Search for: "MATTER OF L H" Results 541 - 560 of 2,080
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2017, 4:34 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
The great thing about tax treaties is that they are controlling, meaning that the provisions in those agreements apply no matter what the law may otherwise say. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
One is therefore faced with a fresh case concerning subject-matter which was not considered before by the ED and which may not have been properly searched. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 6:30 am by Jon L. Gelman
Philip TornettaJudge of Workers’ Compensation(Hackensack) David H. [read post]
18 May 2014, 12:33 pm by Stephen Bilkis
At the time of the death of F, K had two infant children and L had four infant children. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 6:52 am by MBettman
  Justice French, always the stickler in statutory construction matters, urges the appellees and their amici to take this disparity up with the General Assembly. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 3:32 pm
J. 22  *** Matthew Petrie, WHEN A CLAIM ARISES AND WHY IT MATTERS, 16 J. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
It has provided virtually no guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on the degree of statutory specificity necessary to provide agency authority over a major question . . . . [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 10:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
PLI Hot Topics in Advertising Law 2010 Provisional Remedies: TROs & Preliminary Injunctions in Advertising Cases David H. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 9:45 am
… [T]hrough linking cognition to imagination, art can teach about ethical values, as well as about other matters; and … this cognitive merit can be an aesthetic merit too. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:29 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
In the matter of Peacock, heard 14 December 2011. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 11:37 pm
(i) The petitioner is required to attend and cooperate with the medical examination process under (h) above. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 7:21 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
 The probable answer is that it wanted to float new grounds for USCIS adjudicators to use as a script, much like the non-precedent 2008 L-1B GST case, with which to deny ever more H-1B petitions. [read post]