Search for: "MONROE v. US "
Results 541 - 560
of 707
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2011, 2:32 pm
In Experience Hendrix, LLC v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 5:56 pm
NFA Compliance Rule 2-9 (Supervision) requires members to review their operations on a yearly basis using the NFA self-examination checklist II. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:58 am
(Patents Post Grant Blog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC panel disagrees on proper role of specification in claim construction: Arlington v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:42 pm
XVI; Brushaber v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 5:25 am
To view a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Gronski v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 12:22 am
When reading recent US Supreme Court opinions interpreting BAPCPA, the statute's manifest flaws are the "elephant in the room" (origins of phrase here), and Justice Kagan's recent opinion for the Court in Ransom v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 3:00 am
Monroe County, the seat of which is Rochester, is about 100 miles from Binghamton. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:20 am
Justice Phang referenced the case of City Chase Stores v LVMH – the question was whether the concept of infringing acts had to be “trade mark use” in their code. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm
Id. at 353-54.That brings us to Bates v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 3:39 pm
O’Neill v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:02 am
In the recent case of Bias v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 1:30 am
Jay’s Federalist Papers co-authors, Hamilton and Madison weighed in with their views, as did Jefferson, Monroe, and Burr. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:48 pm
Kennedy v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 5:36 pm
Shapo, Constitutional Tort: Monroe v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 8:33 pm
To that end, CMI asserts it represented to the trial courts in Seminole, Sarasota, Manatee, Hillsborough, Escambia, Monroe, and Duval Counties that it was willing to negotiate such an examination to arrive at a comprehensive model that could be used throughout the state. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 3:00 am
Hellman v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 3:49 pm
Online 78 (2010) Rosy Pictures and Renegade Officials: The Slow Death of Monroe v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 12:20 am
Many people have asked us about the status of the “source code” motions in Hillsborough County. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:44 am
According to the plaintiffs, the installation of this equipment deprived them of the physical use, possession, and enjoyment of that portion of their property (see Weaver v Town of Rush, 1 AD3d at 923 [noting that a de facto taking by one having condemnation powers constitutes a permanent interference with an owner's physical use, possession, and enjoyment of property]; Feder v Village of Monroe, 283 AD2d at 549; Sarnelli v City of New… [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 9:09 am
Romantics v. [read post]
