Search for: "Manufacturing Company v. United States"
Results 541 - 560
of 3,109
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2008, 1:35 am
§ 271(e)(1), which states in relevant part: It shall not be an act of infringement to make, use, offer to sell, or sell within the United States or import into the United States a patented invention . . . solely for uses reasonably related to the development and submission of information under a Federal law which regulates the manufacture, use, or sale of drugs or veterinary biological products. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 7:36 am
(Evergreen) appealed from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts dismissing its Second Amended Complaint (complaint). [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 10:33 am
Workers Unions v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 12:34 pm
On consideration, in brief summary, the Appeals Court Order indicates, "The petition of the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, joined by the State of Alaska, Peabody Energy Company, Southeastern Legal Foundation, et al., State Petitioners and Intervenors for Petitioners, for rehearing en banc; and the petition of the National Association of Manufacturers, et al. for rehearing en banc in No. 10-1073, et al. and… [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 2:11 pm
The Caronia Effect For this reason, many observers saw the December 2012 decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 9:33 pm
Most of these cases were filed in various state and federal courts throughout the United States by individual contact lens-wearers who suffered eye infections after using the defective ReNu with MoistureLoc product. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 7:41 am
I would expect that companies can usually design in the U.S., send designs overseas (see Microsoft v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:33 pm
., a nationwide operator of charter schools, will pay $570,000 to settle a pregnancy discrimination lawsuit filed by the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the federal agency announced. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 11:24 am
Swarovski sued Building #19 and managed to obtain a preliminary injunction.Crystal figurine by... oh, wait.Yes, indeed: Swarovski persuaded a United States district court judge to prohibit Building #19 from using the word Swarovski in an ad that stated, truthfully, that the company was selling Swarovski crystal collectibles. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 11:24 am
Swarovski sued Building #19 and managed to obtain a preliminary injunction.Crystal figurine by... oh, wait.Yes, indeed: Swarovski persuaded a United States district court judge to prohibit Building #19 from using the word Swarovski in an ad that stated, truthfully, that the company was selling Swarovski crystal collectibles. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 1:00 am
As news of asbestos-related diseases spread across the United States, the American public started to become increasingly suspicious of asbestos companies that had, for so long, denied the dangers of asbestos exposure. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
This post is based on input and analysis from Reed Smith attorneys across the United States. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:08 am
McIntyre Machinery Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 11:18 am
NASCAR sanctions and produces stock car racing events in the United States and around the world. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 6:56 am
"A few days ago, Qualcomm's stock hit $70 for the first time in three years.It's just that all this good news is in stark contrast to what Qualcomm's lead counsel, Cravath's Evan Chesler, told Judge Gonzalo Curiel of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California about a year ago when Qualcomm was seeking a preliminary injunction requiring four Apple contract manufacturers to make royalty payments prior to a final ruling… [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:30 am
In her concurring opinion, Jackson expanded on that and stated that if the students decided to resell the bags in the United States, then the German manufacturer may be liable under the Lanham Act because the bags have now been placed in domestic commerce – even though, as Jackson acknowledged, the foreign manufacturer “never sold the bags in, or directly into, the United States. [read post]
