Search for: "Martinez v. State"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,663
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2012, 9:53 am
The 9th found the claim procedurally barred but remanded to determine if he could prove cause and prejudice under Martinez v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 4:02 pm
In the case of Smith v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:55 am
Tex. 1990), aff'd sub. nom., U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:08 am
Please continue to check this blog periodically for updates regarding the state of law pertaining to accidental disability retirement benefits and other areas vital to New Jersey Public Safety Officers. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:08 am
Please continue to check this blog periodically for updates regarding the state of law pertaining to accidental disability retirement benefits and other areas vital to New Jersey Public Safety Officers. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 5:12 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 5:52 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
" Martinez v Safir, App. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 9:03 am
Building on Martinez in this term, the Court decided Trevino v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 11:51 am
Read Holder v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 9:46 am
Godfrey v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 11:50 am
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance] Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court Case Name: Eugene Dale Swaney v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 11:26 am
Corp. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:17 am
An example of this is Loma Linda University Adventist Health Sciences Center, et al. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 7:05 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 1:13 am
The case of John Lezell Balentine, 43, appears to be a major test of the impact of the Court’s 7-2 ruling last March in Martinez v. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
"On a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), the complaint must be afforded a liberal construction, the facts therein must be accepted as true, and the plaintiff must be accorded the benefit of every possible favorable inference" (Angeli v Barket, 211 AD3d 896, 897; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87). [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
"On a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), the complaint must be afforded a liberal construction, the facts therein must be accepted as true, and the plaintiff must be accorded the benefit of every possible favorable inference" (Angeli v Barket, 211 AD3d 896, 897; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87). [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 6:34 am
In the Supreme Court’s decision last March in Martinez v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 9:38 am
Martinez, Missouri v. [read post]