Search for: "Matter of Barnette"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,005
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2012, 3:07 am
Barnett v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am
I had written about it; testified to the Senate Judiciary Committee; in three different fora debated Randy Barnett (the owner if not the inventor of the broccoli argument); was the counsel of record in an amicus brief for 104 health law professors; and in October 2010 in an interview on Greta Van Susteren’s Fox TV program offered to eat my hat on camera if the Court struck the Act down. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 7:00 am
Your value to the organization is determined more by the outcome you help to achieve rather than time spent on the matter. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:13 am
Goan – http://bit.ly/OkMJum (Venkat Balasubramani) Factual Material Considered by Expert Is Discoverable Despite Expert Witness Amendments - http://bit.ly/LuCGRb (Gregory Joseph) Failure to Issue a Written Litigation Hold Not Necessarily Fatal - http://bit.ly/LKUv36 (Thomas Tobin) Five Guidelines for Completing the Best Document Review Project – http://bit.ly/PA7xAZ (Jonathan Easton) Google’s Privilege Claim: A Cautionary Tale… [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 5:09 pm
He said: “It could be up and running in a matter of months. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 6:36 pm
Barnett, 70 M.J. 568, 572 (A. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:06 am
A nice insight but … The most influential bloggers on ObamaCare or any other significant legal matter didn’t fall from the sky. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am
Barnett, Commandeering the People: Why the Individual Health Insurance Mandate is Unconstitutional, 5 N.Y.U. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:55 am
The effects of the mandate would not just be a matter of math but would be influenced by people’s inclination to be honest and “their desire to comply with the law” ordering them to buy coverage…. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 11:26 pm
The submission, by Deputy Commissioner Ross Barnett, said more matters were likely to be contested in court, leading to more child victims being required to submit to extensive cross-examination by the defence and a higher chance of traumatic appeals. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:23 am
(Randy Barnett) I am prepared to believe Jonathan’s report that John Roberts has done this before. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 5:13 am
I prefer to assume Randy is operating in good faith on this matter. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 5:29 am
(Randy Barnett) Oh wait, that’s me. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:21 pm
“The court has long said that it doesn't matter what label Congress affixes to an exaction,” Siegel wrote Thursday in an NPR blog. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:09 am
This is a difficult legal distinction to explain, but one that matters nonetheless. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 4:57 am
(Randy Barnett) In my previous post, I explained how no one other than Chief Justice Roberts ever held the legal position that he came, for whatever reason, to hold. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:14 pm
This is a difficult legal distinction to explain, but one that matters nonetheless.” [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:14 pm
This is a difficult legal distinction to explain, but one that matters nonetheless.” [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:46 pm
Readers of this blog might know that the Obamacare saga was one of the main topics that I covered here when I first started blogging back in 2009. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:14 pm
Which leaves Chief Justice Roberts alone, of all the persons who ever have opined on this case in a careful matter, to hold the view he adopts in his opinion. [read post]
