Search for: "Matter of Booker" Results 541 - 557 of 557
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2006, 6:52 pm
Bissonnette A Matter of Life and Death: The Effect of Life-Without-Parole Statutes on Capital Punishment, unsigned Harvard Law Review note. [read post]
4 Sep 2006, 5:45 pm
Great new FSR issue for SCOTUS followers New Justices and the evolution left on criminal justice matters BOOKER CIRCUIT DEVELOPMENTS AND COMMENTARY Tracking reasonableness review outcomes ... final update? [read post]
31 Aug 2006, 9:00 am
  Such disparities are troubling, but what makes them troubling is not that two codefendants received different sentences per se, but that they received different sentences based on a consideration that shouldn't really matter. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 1:29 pm
Grier will consider en banc appropriate burdens of proof in post-Booker federal sentencing. [read post]
16 Aug 2006, 3:01 pm
In imposing a sentence of 37 months the district court stated, "Under Booker, there is a presumption in favor of the Guidelines because the Guidelines express the public policy and the intention of Congress as to the court's authority of these matters and the considerations that the court should address. [read post]
14 Aug 2006, 2:22 pm
It didn't seem to matter to the Court when the district court in U.S. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2005, 8:20 am by Tom Lincoln
That was Booker and Justice Scalia was quite cocky as to "shall" does not mean "may. [read post]
21 Jun 2005, 6:27 pm
In all likelihood, the courts aren't going to hold the Apprendi/Ring/Blakely/Booker "rule" retroactive no matter when you file, but just in case there's no reason to blow the statute of limitations unnecessarily, too.-- Peter Goldberger, Ardmore, PASo you have been warned now. [read post]
17 Jan 2005, 5:22 am
Post-Booker, with Section 3553(b) gone, we still have the remaining subsections of 3553 to deal with. [read post]
16 Jan 2005, 9:12 pm
Booker & Fanfan-- and, given the amount of coverage Booker was receiving elsewhere, I thought it best to not attempt to be the Judge Paul G. [read post]