Search for: "Matter of Clark v Clark" Results 541 - 560 of 1,890
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2010, 9:01 am by PaulKostro
Div., A-0316-07T1, August 11, 2010: The standards for determining when a client can maintain a legal malpractice action against the attorney who acted as counsel in a settled matter had been governed until recently by two cases: Ziegelheim v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 6:19 am by Matt Cooper
A Clark County District Court Judge denied the plaintiffs’ motion. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 7:00 am by ADR Times
Federal Circuit Ducks Question of Federal Mediation Privilege Patently O November 15, 2011 The Pennsylvania case Kimberly-Clark Worldwide v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
However, in the interest of judicial economy, we treat the notice of appeal as a request for permission to appeal and grant the request (see CPLR 5701 [c]; Matter of Greece Town Mall, L.P. v New York State, 140 AD3d at 1382 n 1; Matter of Lally v Johnson City Cent. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
However, in the interest of judicial economy, we treat the notice of appeal as a request for permission to appeal and grant the request (see CPLR 5701 [c]; Matter of Greece Town Mall, L.P. v New York State, 140 AD3d at 1382 n 1; Matter of Lally v Johnson City Cent. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 4:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Borelli had clearly assumed representation of plaintiff by April 7, 2016, because on March 29, 2016, it opposed defendants’ motion for a charging lien on plaintiff’s behalf, and on March 31, 2016, it received plaintiff’s file from defendants (see MacArthur v Hall, McNicol, Hamilton & Clark, 217 AD2d 429, 429-430 [1st Dept 1995]). [read post]