Search for: "Matter of German F." Results 541 - 560 of 746
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2010, 10:06 am
In a 1949 decision in Bernstein, 173 F.2d 71, the 2d Circuit ruled inadmissible statements in which a Jewish victim of persecution described the brutal Nazi imprisonment that led him to “transfer” major assets under duress. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 2:06 am by Tobias Lutzi
(A full case note of mine (in German) on Ellmes Property, touching on this issue as well as others, is forthcoming in the Zeitschrift für das Privatrecht der Europäischen Union (GPR).) [read post]
24 May 2007, 9:08 am
Blagojevich, 469 F.3d 641 (Seventh Circuti Court of Appeals 2006). [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 7:32 pm
  [136 F.2d 661.]So far so conventional. [read post]
16 May 2023, 5:58 am by Fionnuala Ní Aoláin
 However, manufacturers of spyware cannot be held to account for failing to uphold these “soft law” commitments because of the lack of a binding enforcement mechanism (complaints under the OECD system against UK and German spyware manufacturers were effectively ignored). [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 3:05 pm by Oliver G. Randl
As a matter of fact, the amendment leads to a situation where the teaching of claim 1 also comprises embodiments of ventilating installations which had not been disclosed in the original application. [3.3]The Board agrees with the [patentee] in that, as correctly stated in the impugned decision, the amendment leads to a limitation of the claim as granted. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:30 am by Russell Spivak
Late last week, the Second Circuit issued a long-awaited opinion in Doe v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:04 pm by Béligh Elbalti
As a result, the family relationships of Muslim Canadian, French, German or Turkish (whether Tunisian would be included here is unclear) would be governed by the Law. [read post]
15 Jun 2006, 4:45 am by Tobias Thienel
Republic of Argentina, 965 F.2d 699, 718 (9th Cir. 1992); Smith v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 6:20 pm
That, perhaps, is where it matters most—as it affects the lives and realities of individuals who are both rights and risk bearers of human rights and its impacts. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
D2 is found to be the closest prior art.*** Translated from the German ***[4.3] The storage device according to claim 1 differs from the one of D2 by a first group of distinguishing features (hereinafter: “first group of features”), i.e. the part of feature [g] concerning the arrangement of full strand and empty strand, as well as feature [h]. [read post]
The case went up to the German Supreme Federal Court, which confirmed that EP504 was valid and infringed on 24 November 2020. [read post]