Search for: "Matter of Grand Jury Proceeding (Doe)" Results 541 - 560 of 866
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2014, 4:46 pm by Stephen Bilkis
At the time the matter was resubmitted, no action was pending against defendant in a local criminal court, or in any court, and thus the prosecution was under no statutory duty to inform defendant that a second grand jury presentation against him would be made. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 11:26 am by Daniel A. Burton, Esq.
If the offense is indictable, pursuant to New Jersey court Rule 3:4-2(b), the judge shall: (1) give the defendant a copy of the complaint and inform the defendant of the charge; (2) inform the defendant of the right to remain silent and that any statement may be used against the defendant; (3) inform the defendant of the right to retain counsel and, if indigent, the right to be represented by the public defender; (4) ask the defendant specifically whether he or she wants counsel and record… [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 1:24 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In written submissions and at argument, defendant's counsel argued that the evidence against the defendant was highly suspect and that despite his guilty plea and the complainant's grand jury testimony, there was not reliable evidence that he was guilty of the instant robbery crime. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:15 pm by Bob Farb
A witness who invokes the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination in any criminal or civil hearing or proceeding, including a grand jury, may be ordered to testify or produce other information when the witness has been granted immunity under Article 61 of Chapter 15A. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 4:50 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The standard of proof in a Grand Jury proceeding is "sufficient evidence and reasonable grounds to believe the defendant committed the offense charged. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 7:30 pm
While the court was awaiting the People's response, the prosecutor, unbeknownst to the court, presented both the defendant matters to a special narcotics grand jury. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 7:30 pm
A Queens Criminal Lawyer said that while the court was awaiting the People's response, the prosecutor, unbeknownst to the court, presented both the defendant matters to a special narcotics grand jury. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:48 pm
The New York County District Attorney (the "DA") filed a criminal complaint against her and plaintiff was indicted by a Grand Jury on 316 felony counts for the crimes of grand larceny in the first and third degrees and falsifying business records in the first degree. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 7:47 pm
Nor do we find merit to respondent’s claim that the proceeding to recommit him was untimely. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 7:57 pm
He was indicted for Conspiracy in the Second Degree, Criminal Sale of a Controlled Substance in the First Degree and related offenses by a Grand Jury sitting in New Jersey County. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:02 am by Paul M. Secunda
Lane should have had protections under the free speech provisions of the First Amendment after he was fired allegedly for testifying under subpoena in both grand jury and criminal trial proceedings against a former employee under his supervision. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:56 pm by Benjamin Wittes
In the criminal context, think of Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, which prohibits disclosure of proceedings taking place before a grand jury, which hears all sorts of raw allegations and impressions. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 6:23 am by Joy Waltemath
That state representative was subsequently investigated by the FBI and indicted for mail fraud and theft; the employee testified before a federal grand jury and at her trial regarding his reasons for firing her. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 5:14 am by Michael DelSignore
Freeman, 407 Mass. 279 (1990), This second claim is the one raised by the prosecutors in the Hernandez matter, and it essentially alleges that there was prosecutorial misconduct at the time of the grand jury proceeding. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:26 am
In November 2006, Lane testified before a federal grand jury about his reasons for firing Schmitz…. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 10:59 am by Stephen Bilkis
This is an Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, robbery in the first degree (two counts), and grand larceny in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. [read post]