Search for: "Matter of Hamilton" Results 541 - 560 of 2,298
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
  Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Lachaux, it will often be best to leave the matter for trial (see, for example, Steyn J, in James v Saunders [2019] EWHC 3265 (QB) at [16]-[17]), although as indicated by Warby J in Hamilton v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2020] EWHC 59 (QB) there will be cases where the issue can sensibly be dealt with at a preliminary trial. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 10:13 am by Camille Milner
No matter what our education or sophistication level, we all do that, and when we do that, we have a really hard time being objective, even for the benefit of our children. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 5:05 pm by Mitu Gulati
Alexander Hamilton certainly thought so in the Report on Public Credit in 1790 (here). [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
There was a news on the ICO’s website and a piece on Mishcon De Reya Data Matters blog. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 3:47 pm by Camille Milner
No matter what our education or sophistication level, we all do that, and when we do that, we have a really hard time being objective, even for the benefit of our children. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 7:18 am by Bob Bauer
He believes it “100 percent wrong” to put weight on Hamilton’s position in Federalist 65 that impeachment is available to address broadly an “abuse or violation of some public trust. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 12:48 pm by Mitu Gulati
As a practical matter, in terms of the playbook of the modern sovereign debt restructurer, Hamilton’s admonition seems to have held sway. [read post]
18 Jan 2020, 7:22 am by David Post
I've never been particularly skilled at predicting how Justices will vote on particular matters, and I'll spare you my predictions here. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 5:00 am by Bob Bauer
On Dec. 17 and Dec. 19, 2019, and Jan. 8 of this year, speaking from the Senate floor, Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell made the case that the Trump impeachment was setting a “toxic” and “nightmarish” precedent “deeply damaging to the institutions of American government. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:12 pm by Mieke Eoyang, Anisha Hindocha
If the Senate wanted to proceed as if this were a summary judgment matter, it would have to assume that those facts were all true. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 12:50 pm by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
The next day, General Pinkston’s office released a statement saying “General Pinkston believes [plaintiff] perjured himself in Hamilton County Juvenile Court on Monday, February 15. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 7:23 pm by Melanie Fontes
  In reviewing the 19 prior impeachments, few of the matters charged would rise to the level of actual indictable crimes. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 7:23 am by Adam Feldman
We should reflect on our duty to judge without fear or favor, deciding each matter with humility, integrity, and dispatch. [read post]
Perhaps a coalescence of a majority of the House and two-thirds of the Senate would demonstrate such a consensus, but in an era of divided government and national political party loyalty, it seems more likely that such an impeachment would, as Hamilton warned in Federalist 65, “agitate the passions of the whole community . . . [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 3:01 pm by Amy Howe
We should reflect on our duty to judge without fear or favor, deciding each matter with humility, integrity, and dispatch. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 8:33 am
The year 2019 is ending with the great rifts--opened in 2016, exposed in 2017, and acquiring a greater urgency and revealing the power of its consequences in 2018--now exposed. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 6:59 am
Bell, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, on Thursday, December 26, 2019 Tags: Accountability, Anti-corruption, Disclosure, Dodd-Frank Act, International governance, Regulation S-K, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Section 1504, Securities regulation, Transparency [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 3:49 pm by Colleen Baker
As a historical matter, the U.S. has twice successfully restructured its finances: “once in the 1790’s under Alexander Hamilton’s debt repayment scheme and again at the start of the New Deal when it abrogated the gold clauses in its debt... [read post]