Search for: "Matter of Jennings" Results 541 - 560 of 822
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2017, 1:59 pm
Jennings, 69 N.Y.2d 103, 115, 512 N.Y .S2d 652, 657, 504 N.E.2d 1079, 1084 (1986). [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 11:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Cuomo announces thirteen new appointments to his administration Jen McCormick has been appointed First Deputy Commissioner of the Department of Agriculture and Markets. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
  Victor Orban has replaced William Jennings Bryan as the epitome of a populist leader. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 4:03 am by Charles Kels
To be fair, the Manual envisions such authorized activities to be of the “support” variety, but that seems fairly inconsequential as a matter of international law. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 2:13 am
SpecialKat Hayleigh Bosher reviews it.GuestKat Rosie Burbidge reviews The EU Design Approach, edited by Annette Kur, Marianne Levin and Jens Schovsbo. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 7:00 am by Staley Smith
"   Yishai and Jen Williams gave us an update on the Middle East where tensions between Bahrain and Iran continue to rise, Israel is providing limited cooperation to the ICC’s preliminary examination into last summer’s Gaza [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 7:25 am
The arbitrator's original opinion and award makes all required factual findings, sets forth the applicable law, reaches the necessary legal conclusions, and makes an award that finally determines all pending matters. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 11:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
But it’s all starting to blur together in subject matter and terminology. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 5:11 am by Gerard Magliocca
Rev. 80, 132 n.169 (1991) (quoting Justice Hugo Black’s view that “a judge who refuses ever to stray from his judicial philosophy, and be subject to criticism for doing so, no matter how important the issue involved, is a fool”); see also Terminiello v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 12:52 pm by Genevieve Lakier
The advisory and accompanying press conference, in which White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki announced that 12 people were producing 65 percent of the anti-vaccine misinformation on social media platforms and called on Facebook, in particular, to take “faster action against harmful posts,” generated a vigorous debate about whether the White House’s actions violated the First Amendment rights of Facebook and its users. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 12:52 pm by Genevieve Lakier
The advisory and accompanying press conference, in which White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki announced that 12 people were producing 65 percent of the anti-vaccine misinformation on social media platforms and called on Facebook, in particular, to take “faster action against harmful posts,” generated a vigorous debate about whether the White House’s actions violated the First Amendment rights of Facebook and its users. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 9:11 am by Patrick S. O'Donnell
Then the cause is important enough that international law doesn’t matter. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 5:25 am by Chris Mirasola
To further complicate matters, the Chinese Ministry of Agriculture announced a proposal to again ban fishing in areas of the South China Sea. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 5:01 am by Alan Z. Rozenshtein
When White House press secretary Jen Psaki was asked who gave the legal sign-off on the new moratorium, she identified other sources of legal advice: The CDC’s lawyers, as well as our Counsel’s Office—yes. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm by Jeff Hermes
By September 2013, the OMLN had placed its 500th client matter with a network attorney. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 12:00 am by Jeff Hermes
By September 2013, the OMLN had placed its 500th client matter with a network attorney. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Two matters of form are especially notable in this regard. [read post]
2 May 2016, 12:48 pm by Peter Margulies
However, the report is correct that these missteps do not rise to the level of war crimes (see Jens Da [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 5:29 am by Susan Brenner
Rule 801(c) of the Federal Rules of Evidence defines hearsay as “a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted. [read post]