Search for: "Matter of S.W." Results 541 - 560 of 1,491
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2015, 7:41 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
While prompt resolution of your legal matter is our goal, our approach is fundamentally different. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 6:40 am by David Kramer
., 455 S.W.3d 899 (Ky. 2015), the Court sent the matter back for retrial after noting that the prosecutor had handed the defense a prima facie showing of gender discrimination “on a silver platter” by defending his strike of an African-American woman with the statement: “In all honesty, I was striking  women. [read post]
29 May 2015, 3:18 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
This privilege applies to bona fide statements made in good faith under circumstances where the author believes that the public has an important interest in a particular subject matter requiring publication, or where the author believes that a person having a common interest in a particular subject matter is entitled to know the information. [read post]
14 May 2015, 9:03 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Williams, 371 S.W.3d 171 (Tex. 2012) and subsequent citing cases (progeny)  Meanwhile, the Corpus Christi Court of Appeals had ruled that a hospital visitor injured by a sliding door with lateral guillotine functionality -- a plaintiff who like Ross in the supreme court case also was not a patient -- can't pursue a premises liability claim against the hospital because her personal injury claim is a health care liability claim and she did not file an expert report showing how… [read post]
13 May 2015, 8:30 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
If a contract for insurance has a clear and definite meaning, then it is not ambiguous as a matter of law, even if the parties interpret the policy differently. [read post]
8 May 2015, 3:29 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
., 418 S.W.3d 547 (Tenn. 2013), the motion to dismiss was granted by the trial court. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:11 pm
  Defendants argued that (1) they were entitled to judgment as a matter of law because plaintiffs’ warnings claim was preempted, under principles of implied conflict preemption; and 2) plaintiffs failed to prove causation because their causation expert was unqualified to render his causation opinions. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm by MOTP
So why should the former be a matter of arbitrability properly passed on by the Court, but the latter a matter to be arbitrated (rather than a threshold matter of whether an arbitration referral is (still) appropriate, or has been forfeited by undue delay? [read post]