Search for: "May v. Justices" Results 541 - 560 of 52,914
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2014, 7:22 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 March 2014. [read post]
3 May 2014, 11:40 am by Sanjana
v=69…— STITCH Movement (@stitchmovement) May 03, 2014 Last breakout session today going on. [read post]
3 May 2014, 11:40 am by Sanjana
v=69…— STITCH Movement (@stitchmovement) May 03, 2014 Last breakout session today going on. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 12:55 pm by Amy Howe
Postal Service (Feb. 20): Whether the government is a “person” who may petition to institute review proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act Mission Product Holdings v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:34 am by Katherine J. Neikirk
The May 2011 issue of Metropolitan Corporate Counsel contains an interview with Chief Justice Myron T. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:31 am by Harold O'Grady
Sharpe); holding that the states may not apportion a chamber of their legislatures in the manner in which the United States Senate is apportioned (Reynolds v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 6:51 pm by Howard Bashman
“What’s dividing the Justices (and other initial reactions to the Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 10:02 am by David Markus
Elwood is also a former assistant to the solicitor general and clerk to Justice Anthony Kennedy.The brief in opposition is due April 21, so the justices could act soon on the petition.Virginia v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 7:07 am by Jonathan H. Adler
[In an opinion respecting the denial of certiorari, Justice Thomas suggests it may be time to reconsider Gonzales v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 3:31 am
Employee may be subject to discipline for "off the job" misconduct Rivera v Farrell, NYS Supreme Court, Justice Stallman, [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports] From time to time an employee is served with disciplinary charges alleging that his or her off-duty conduct violated a rule or regulation of the employer. [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:03 pm
Justice Corrigan authors a powerful opinion that holds that it's not permissible for the police to conduct a Terry stop just because someone's in a high crime area and pretending to tie his shoe behind a car in order to avoid the police, and Justice Evan authors an equally powerful concurrence (joined by a majority of the Court) that highlights the racial implications of a rule that assumes that the "normal" response to a police encounter is to welcome… [read post]