Search for: "May v. Supreme Court of State of Colorado" Results 541 - 560 of 1,957
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2013, 9:16 am by Nancy B.
  The Court of Appeals agreed.In its opinion, the Court of Appeals reiterated the economic loss rule espoused in the Colorado Supreme Court in the Town of Alma v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 2:37 pm by Yasamin Parsafar
Patentees and inventors of cannabis compounds may be happy to learn a district court in Colorado recently held that, based on the record before it, U.S. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
At his eponymous blog, Lyle Denniston looks at the factors that may underlie the Supreme Court’s one-sentence order on Wednesday denying a request to expedite review of a partisan-gerrymandering case from Maryland, Benisek v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 5:45 am by SHG
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument in one of the most contentious cases of the term, Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:25 am by David DePaolo
The board reasoned that Stephen’s agreement with Family Dollar prohibited Mamie from seeking death benefits, as her claim was derivative of his.The Court of Appeals disagreed and vacated the board's decision on Friday based on a state Supreme Court case from 1930, called Brashear v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 6:37 pm by Abbie Peterson
 Colorado Supreme Court Upholds “Consent-to-Amend” Provision in an HOA’s Declaration. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm
 The Colorado Civil Rights Commission ruled against the bakery, and a state appeals court upheld its decision. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
In the specific context of excluding religious schools from participation in educational benefits programs, the Supreme Court has thrice held that a state may not exclude religious observers from receiving otherwise available educational  funding because of a school's religious status or practice. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 8:44 pm by Brady Iandiorio
The court affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment and denied a motion to grant certification of the question to the Colorado Supreme Court.In the end, it appears we will have to wait a bit longer for the Colorado Supreme Court to weigh in on the coverage dilemma raised by General Security and C.R.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 3:43 pm by Ryke Longest
Citing to Will Rogers, the Supreme Court noted that the Rio Grande may be the only river that could benefit from irrigation. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 4:54 pm by Patricia Salkin
” Because the Act and rules were content neutral under Supreme Court precedent, the court reviewed under the intermediate scrutiny standard of review. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 6:06 am
People, 177 Colo. 306, 494 P.2d 97, (Colorado Supreme Court 1972). . . . [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
Constitution Daily reports that “[o]ne of the most-significant cases of the Supreme Court’s current term,” United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am by Marty Lederman
  For what it's worth, I think the Court probably reached the right result with respect to the decision of the Colorado Supreme Court, albeit not quite for the right reasons. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Supreme Court’s Most Significant Decisions of 2023 In Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 12:06 pm by Ronald Mann
Justice Scalia in particular thought it untenable to suggest that a party could waive the effects of a statute, like the TIA, addressed directly to the courts; the TIA, for example, specifically prohibits the district courts from enjoining the “collection of any tax under State law where a plain, speedy and efficient remedy may be had in the courts of such State. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:29 pm by Patricia Salkin
In Hill, the United States Supreme Court found no regulation of speech content, but only where that speech may be exercised, noting the state interest in protecting access and privacy and a need to provide police with clear guidelines. [read post]