Search for: "Means v. Means" Results 541 - 560 of 98,714
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2015, 2:03 am by Mark Summerfield
  In Garford Pty Ltd v DYWIDAG Systems International Pty Ltd [2015] FCAFC 6, the court confirmed that ‘[a] claim to an apparatus for a particular purpose is a claim to an apparatus that is suitable for that purpose …. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 3:52 am
The Court of Appeal has overturned a High Court judgment on the meaning of an arbitration clause and clarified the meaning of "claim" in a public liability policy. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am by Peter Groves
In Secretary of State for Health v Servier Laboratories Ltd, where the loss arose because there were no generic equivalents of the invalidly-patented drug, the Supreme Court held that the "dealing requirement" laid down in OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1, which states that the unlawful means should have affected the third party’s freedom to deal with the claimant, is a necessary element of the tort. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:36 pm by Media Law Prof
Enrico Bonadio, City University London, the City Law School, and Mauro Santo, M&R Europe, Intellectual Property Legal Advisors, Milan, have published 'Communication to the Public' in FAPL v QC Leisure and Murphy v Media Protection Services (C-403/08 and C-429/08) at... [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:13 am by Russ Bensing
  Back in 1981, in California v. [read post]