Search for: "Merit Management, Inc.," Results 541 - 560 of 2,131
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2018, 4:01 am by Administrator
The Court of Appeal noted that in Soprema Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 9:47 am by Ian Patterson
Immersion and NetImpact Strategies, Inc. were the only vendors to timely submit proposals in response to the Solicitation. [read post]
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 7:07 am by Joy Waltemath
At the calibration meetings, managers “presented the merits of their own employees and attempted to discredit the merits of the other [managers’] employees. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 3:18 am by Peter Mahler
Pennsylvania: The Hornberger Case Hornberger v Dave Gutelius Excavating, Inc., 2017 PA Super 395 [Super. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 12:17 pm by J. Ross Pepper
An instructive case on what Tennessee courts would consider to be unreasonably withholding consent to an assignment of a lease by a landlord is 1963 Jackson, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 12:17 pm by J. Ross Pepper
An instructive case on what Tennessee courts would consider to be unreasonably withholding consent to an assignment of a lease by a landlord is 1963 Jackson, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:37 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[vii] Thus, directors, officers, managers and similarly situated people need to closely examine the governing documents of the entity to determine what protection, if any, is conferred. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:01 am by Peter Mahler
For many years, petitioner Nedal Hammad, who holds 25% of the shares in each company, controlled the day-to-day operations of all seven companies as a salaried officer and through his separate management company. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 6:31 am by Eliot Kim
This interpretation excluded the developed commercial activities exception, so the plaintiffs urged Judge Bates to instead follow the Third Circuit’s decision in OSS Nokalva, Inc. v. [read post]