Search for: "Million v. Board of Education" Results 541 - 560 of 1,000
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
However, the jury determined that the City was "liable for negligence with respect to the incident . . . under a respondeat superior theory" and awarded plaintiff $3 million in damages, with 90% apportioned to the City. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by John Gregory
Much of the recent debate in the U.S. has focused on the case of Loomis v Wisconsin. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 7:09 pm
Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954) ("Does segregation of children in public schools solely on the basis of race, even though the physical facilities and other "tangible" factors may be equal, deprive the children of the minority group of equal educational opportunities? [read post]
11 Nov 2024, 12:54 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Sir Peter Lane (sitting as a Judge in the High Court) heard the appeal and defendant’s application in the case of Secretary of State for Education v Marples  KA-2024-000095. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 4:45 pm by Reference Staff
Like the Blake legislation, SB 5440 is derived from a court case, Trueblood v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 3:16 pm
” For Google it is back to the drawing board for now. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:02 pm by admin
By Andrei Mincov (Mincov Law Corporation) On July 12, 2012, the Supreme Court of Canada issued its reasons in five copyright cases (Alberta (Education) v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 1:43 pm by Hannah Kris
We encourage proactive engagement with government, business and community partners to enhance the impact of research and education and improve the employability of our students. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
NPR reports: . . . for decades, there were reports that students in the boarding schools were abused. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:32 pm by Carter Ruml
., all transfer taxes, all the time) with a report on a truly resounding taxpayer FLP win: Estate of Murphy v. [read post]