Search for: "Mock v. State" Results 541 - 560 of 860
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2011, 11:19 am by Jamison Koehler
United States (suppression of illegally obtained evidence), Crawford v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
John's University School of LawKatherine Schostok, DePaul University College of LawAllison Winnike, University of Houston Law Center 5:00 – 7:00 PM Welcome Reception – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law Friday, June 9, 20177:30 – 8:15 AM Registration & Breakfast – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law 8:15 – 8:30 AM Opening Remarks – Ceremonial Courtroom, Georgia State LawWendy Hensel, Interim Dean and Professor of Law, Georgia… [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 4:51 am by Jani
Although the UK's cousins across the pond in the United States and Australia have accepted parody as a form of fair dealing or use prior to the old Kingdom, the UK will face challenges to this new regime in the coming years - for which European consideration is always welcome.The case in question is Deckmyn v Vandersteen , decided only a few weeks ago, which dealt with a drawing relating to a recent election in Belgium, which was released in a calendar edited by Mr. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 5:32 pm
 Reaching consistency throughout the different states seems unlikely. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Article V, which permits amendment, exists because the Framers were persuaded that the powerful would find ways to circumvent the limits that were built in. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
” Molan asserts that she wasn’t mocking Pacific Islander names when she uttered “hooka looka mooka hooka fooka” because mocking involves cruelty. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:58 am by Ken Lopez
Litigating for or against the United States is a special situation. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 1:26 am by Melina Padron
Football Association Premier League and Others v QC Leisure and Others Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd October 4, 2011 System of licences for broadcasting football matches which grants broadcasters territorial exclusivity on a Member State basis and prohibits television viewers from watching broadcasts with decoder card in other Member States is contrary to EU law. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 6:43 am by Adam J. White
’s commitment to the Paris Accord is precisely the sort of “reliance interest” which, under the Supreme Court’s explanation in FCC v. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Events Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Mosslmani by his tutor Karout v DailyMail.com [2016] NSWDC 357 the District Court dismissed most of the claims brought by Ziggi Mosslmani, the Sydney teenager who has sued three newspaper outlets for defamation after they mocked his mullet. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 11:16 am by Eugene Volokh
Or for stating that biological males who view themselves as female should be viewed as men, not as women. [read post]