Search for: "Olds v. Georgia" Results 541 - 560 of 1,255
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2016, 9:02 pm by Joseph Margulies
They supported the Klan after Brown v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
  If mere registration and the accompanying appointment of an in state agent―without an express consent to general jurisdiction – nonetheless sufficed to confer general jurisdiction by implicit consent, every corporation would be subject to general jurisdiction in every state in which it registered, and Daimler’s ruling would be robbed of meaning by a back‐door thief.Id. at 47-48 (citations omitted).Further, too much constitutional jurisdictional water has flown under… [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Dingemans J gave judgment in Lokhova v Tymula ([2016] EWHC 225 (QB))(heard 26 and 27 January 2016). [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:06 pm by CJLF Staff
Supreme Court's decision in Hurst v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
[Ken Womble, Fault Lines on Long Island case of People v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
C.M. is a single man, almost 50 years old, who lives in Georgia. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 4:59 am by SHG
Georgia, 394 U.S. 557, 564 (1969); in the Fourth and Fifth Amendments, Terry v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 2:23 pm by Robin Frazer Clark
Tucker will be a case I’ll be watching as it turns on the old “discretionary v. ministerial” argument trap that really needs to be abolished in favor of including all such claims against counties as part of the Georgia Tort Claims Act. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 2:23 pm by Robin Frazer Clark
Tucker will be a case I’ll be watching as it turns on the old “discretionary v. ministerial” argument trap that really needs to be abolished in favor of including all such claims against counties as part of the Georgia Tort Claims Act. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 2:51 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
Next week, the 110th AALS Annual Meeting starts in New York. [read post]
Two other district courts (in West Virginia and Georgia) ruled that they did not have jurisdiction to consider the validity of the Rule because jurisdiction for such a determination rested only with the circuit courts pursuant to 33 U.S.C. [read post]