Search for: "P. v. Rogers"
Results 541 - 560
of 665
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2009, 5:55 am
Rogers, 2009 La. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 12:24 pm
Lisa P. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 6:01 pm
That was an issue that was recently addressed in the published Appellate Division decision of Pansini Custom Design Associates, LLC and Roger Parkin Joint Venture v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 7:32 am
BAD DECISIONThe Law Offices of Roger P. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 4:27 am
Crane, 34 FLW 708, 1st DCA, even though Def out-of-state DUI could not be used for enhancement in criminal case as is not substantially similar could be used in administrative hearing for license revocation-criminal sentence is separate from administrative license revocation.The Law Offices of Roger P. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 7:16 am
Chiovenda, Instituciones de Derecho Procesal, Argentina, 2005, p. 46). [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 2:45 am
DHSMV, 34 FLW 520, DUI, Adm review of suspension - licensee was denied due process when hearing officer failed to issue subpoena for individuals who inspected breath test, although inspection reports authored by these individuals were received in evidence and considered by the hearing officer in sustaining the license suspension - circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law in concluding the hearing officer did not have the authority to issue subpoenasThe Law Offices of… [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 6:37 pm
Tritek Telecom v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:40 am
You should use this citation whenever you cite the opinion, with a P.3d parallel citation. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 9:59 pm
See, e.g., Rogers v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 10:46 pm
Galazz, 34 FLW 335, 3rd DCA, suspended sentence, standing alone, is an illegal sentence - power to suspend sentence can be exercised only as incident to probation - trial court properly vacated the plea - to render suspended sentence illegal, it would be necessary to add term of probationChen and Fifnje, 34 FLW 339, 2nd DCA, Anticipatory warrant - U.S. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 2:37 am
Supreme CourtValdes, 34 FLW 116, New dj test, 775.021(4) (b) (2) prohibits separate punishments for crimes arising from the same criminal transactions only when the statute itself provides for an offense with multiple degrees-, (4)(b)(2) offenses constitute different degree of same offenses with multiple degrees, discharging a firearm within 1000 feet of a person in violation of 790.15(2) and shooting into an occupied vehicle 790.10 same offense does not violate double jeopardy, State v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 6:27 am
Hickey, Roger C. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 5:32 am
P), 2009 Ore. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 8:26 pm
See Rogers v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 11:53 am
Lewis, 189 P.3d 1134 (Colo. 2008). [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 9:08 am
In Dred Scott v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 12:00 am
Rogers v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 5:19 am
Larimore v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 9:45 am
Hale ; associate editors, Gail V. [read post]
