Search for: "P.R."
Results 541 - 560
of 618
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2008, 11:21 am
If so, he needs a new P.R. flack. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 7:15 pm
I don't know why, but seeing the statement from a p.r. firm regarding a law firm layoff struck me as odd and made me wonder which constituents Cadwalader is most concerned about… Clients? [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 9:05 pm
Rigsby deposition: when State Farm called a meeting to brainstorm ways to counter Mississippi AG Hood's P.R. campaign against them, state troopers showed up and took down license plates [Lange/YallPolitics] Special welcome mat for New York business? [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 9:13 am
Further supporting this is language I saw this morning in an order in one of my early cases, which stated "The Court further instructed the parties that the time for complying with P.R. 3-1 would be 10 days after the date of the parties filing their proposed orders. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 8:39 pm
Discovery and scheduling orders in the cases heard today are due in 14 days, and plaintiffs' P.R. 3-1/3.2 disclosures ten days after that. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 10:55 am
January 4, 2008Re: Halberstam And History.Dear Colleagues: It is often remarked that Korea is a war about which most of us know little or nothing. [read post]
29 Dec 2007, 9:06 pm
Then, as p.r. disaster loomed, it apologized for sending the nastygram -- the second one, at least, the one to the blogger. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 10:10 pm
Cesare P.R. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 1:41 pm
Sounds like a p.r. move to better justify not releasing details about the firm's clients. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 8:55 am
P.R. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 7:48 pm
SOME BAD P.R. for the Ron Paul campaign. [read post]
Defendant's own testimony established standing; court reminds Government of Simmons, for some reason
31 Oct 2007, 4:58 am
P.R. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 9:48 pm
P.R. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 4:00 am
"Even some publicists for law firms see the Super Lawyers ad inserts as the worst form of P.R. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 3:02 am
But what I love about this one is the exquisite mindscrew that can come only from conscience-deprived minds like those who spout tobacco company p.r. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 6:28 pm
P.R. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 10:41 am
I'm sure there's more smoke waiting to come blasting out of the Metro p.r. machine before this one's over. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 3:11 pm
While Google says it will improve DoubleClick's privacy policies if it acquires the company, it's certainly not clear from its current P.R. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 6:48 am
In probate and guardianship proceedings the key temporary-injunction case to focus on is In re: Estate of Barsanti, 773 So.2d 1206 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), in which the probate court was reversed for failing to apply the different and much more liberal standard for granting temporary injunctions in contested probate proceedings: Based on the record before us, we find that the probate court abused its discretion in failing to grant the temporary injunction and in finding that the P.R.… [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 12:22 pm
Meanwhile, let's all consider how much this huge p.r. effort is costing the city, and whether it's worth it. [read post]
