Search for: "PEOPLES v. UNITED STATES" Results 541 - 560 of 22,646
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Global Freedom of Expression, Columbia University: Newsletter, 10 February 2024
10 Feb 2024, 1:07 am by INFORRM
In Guerra v. [read post]
Inforrm's Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
Tucker Carlson: The Vladimir Putin Interview--Video and Transcript (English and Russian)
9 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
Putin ("President Vladimir V. [read post]
Law at the End of the Day - https://lcbackerblog.blogspot.com/
[Josh Blackman] Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part III: Justice Kavanaugh Gets Griffin's Case  and Justice Barrett gets FedCourts
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm by Josh Blackman
Most people assume that the leading argument Seth and I have advanced is "Officers of the United. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
SCOTUS dispatch: ‘in the room where it happened’ for the oral arguments in the Trump v. Anderson ballot disqualification case
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm by Marissa Zupancic | U. Pittsburgh School of Law, US
  On Thursday, Februrary 8, I sat in the courtroom of the Supreme Court of the United States on assignment for JURIST to hear oral arguments in Trump v. [read post]
JURIST - Paper Chase - https://www.jurist.org/news/
[Josh Blackman] Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part II: Justice Jackson Gets "Office under the United States"
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am by Josh Blackman
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part I: Justice Gorsuch Gets "Officers of the United States"
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am by Josh Blackman
During oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
“The Spirit of Aloha”: The Hawaii Supreme Court Challenges the U.S. Supreme Court Over Gun Rights
9 Feb 2024, 3:56 am by jonathanturley
On Wednesday,  in State v. [read post]
Jonathan Turley - https://jonathanturley.org/
:@WilliamBaude: Is Congress A "Backstop"?
9 Feb 2024, 3:03 am by Will Baude
  In the course of considering certain "Special Situations" (p. 29), we consider who all might have authority to enforce Section Three with respect to the constitutional ineligibility of an individual for the office of President of the United States. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
When can a libel be defended as honest opinion? – Percy Preston
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Nothing in the post-2013 Act case law suggests that the section 3(3) requirement is any less permissive (see, for example, the first instance decision in Butt v Secretary of State [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB), and particularly Mr Justice Nicol’s comments at [39]. [read post]
Inforrm's Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
A packed courtroom for the Trump ballot case
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm by Mark Walsh
Term Limits v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Takeaways from the Supreme Court oral arguments on the Trump 14th Amendment case
8 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
“It’s by the chief justice of the United States a year after the 14th Amendment,” Kavanaugh said in a reference to Chase. [read post]
J&Y Personal Injury Blog - https://jnylaw.com/blog/
[Ilya Somin] Thoughts on the Supreme Court Oral Argument in the Trump Section 3 Case
8 Feb 2024, 1:47 pm by Ilya Somin
(Wikimedia)Today's Supreme Court oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Eugene Volokh] "Seven Questions on Section 3: A Response to Professor Kurt Lash"
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Supreme Court Hears Trump v. Anderson: What To Expect
8 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by jonathanturley
” Indeed, they reject any difference between  an “Officer of the United States” and an “Office under the United States. [read post]
Jonathan Turley - https://jonathanturley.org/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Marty Lederman
Term Limits v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of Appointment that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm by Marty Lederman
Term Limits v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Josh Blackman] Tillman in the Times: "A Legal Outsider, an Offbeat Theory and the Fate of the 2024 Election"
7 Feb 2024, 7:42 am by Josh Blackman
At issue is the meaning of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, adopted after the Civil War, which bars people from holding office if they participated in an insurrection after having sworn to uphold the Constitution as an "officer of the United States. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Charles Wilkinson on the History of the Boldt Decision
7 Feb 2024, 3:58 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Like Brown v. [read post]
Turtle Talk - https://turtletalk.blog/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Six: The Two “Off-Ramp” Arguments Based Upon In re Griffin’s Case that Would Allow the Supreme Court to Avoid Deciding Whether Trump is Eligible to be President
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
  The state courts, for example, are not trying to enjoin Donald Trump from taking office. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
:@WilliamBaude: The Use and Misuse of Section Three's "Legislative History": Part II
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am by Will Baude
  He makes a similar inference (at 61) from the silence of most people on the issue of self-execution. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/