Search for: "PETERS v. PETERS" Results 541 - 560 of 8,542
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2006, 6:14 am
If you’re going to read one law opinion today from the Third District Appellate Court of California’s Court of Appeals, read People v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 3:40 am
In Evans and another v Focal Point Fires Plc [2009] EWHC 2794 Mr. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 8:52 am by Rick Hasen
The following is a guest post from Peter Keisler and Richard Bernstein, delving deep into Trump’s hypertechnical lead argument: Former President Trump’s reply brief in Trump v. [read post]
19 Feb 2004, 4:01 pm
On February 20, 1809, US Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall ruled in United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
In late June, the High Court of Ireland issued a 38-page judgment in Health Service Executive v JM. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by IPWatchdog
This week in Other Barks & Bites: Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) gets active on copyright matters, signing a trio of letters related to piracy and Copyright Office matters; Karyn Temple leaves her post as Register of Copyrights at the Copyright Office; the Supreme Court decides Peters v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 8:15 am by Charles R. Macedo
On June 25, 2019, the New York Intellectual Property Association (NYIPLA) filed an Amicus Brief in support of the Respondent in Peter v. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 5:27 am
NIGEL PETER ALBON (T/A N A CARRIAGE CO) v (1) NAZA MOTOR TRADING SDN BHD (A company incorporated with limited liability in Malaysia) (2) TAN SRI DATO NASIMUDDIN AMIN [2007] EWHC 1879 (Ch). [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 1:23 am
NIGEL PETER ALBON (T/A N A CARRIAGE CO) v (1) NAZA MOTOR TRADING SDN BHD (A company incorporated with limited liability in Malaysia) (2) TAN SRI DATO NASIMUDDIN AMIN [2007] EWHC 9 (Ch) Summary: the words “in respect of a contract” in the CPR r.6.20(5) did not require that the claim arose under a contract; they [...] [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 9:19 am by Andrew Hamm
On December 7, The Heritage Foundation will host a discussion on Fisher v. [read post]