Search for: "POOLE v POOLE" Results 541 - 560 of 4,817
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2022, 1:05 pm by Christopher J. Hubbert
In addition, the SEC took the position that the BIAs are notes under the four-part test articulated in Reves v. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 9:03 am by Alvaro Marañon
President Biden signed an executive order on March 9, 2022, outlining the United States government’s strategy and objectives for cryptocurrencies and other digital assets. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 2:58 am by Florian Mueller
Both parties have been granted leave to file pleadings until then.Unlike the situation between IP Bridge and OPPO, the IP Bridge v. [read post]
Chapter V of the Regulation authorizes public sector bodies and Union institutions, agencies or bodies to request access to data from data holders if they demonstrate an “exceptional need” to use the data requested. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 8:45 pm
v=o0OIfdlwZHwVideo Credit: Sean Evans, @evvo1991https://www.backtothemovies.com/ [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:44 am by Florian Mueller
It's very shortsighted on some app developers' part to bet on overreaching interpretations of decisions--be it Judge YGR's "consolation prize" injunction in Epic Games v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 7:49 am by Alexander J. Davie
” As proposed, an illiquid fund would be defined as a fund that (i) has a limited life; (ii) does not continuously raise capital; (iii) is not required to redeem interests upon an investor’s request; (iv) has as a predominant operating strategy to return the proceeds from the disposition of investments to investors; (v) has limited opportunities, if any, for investors to withdraw before the termination of the fund; and (vi) does not routinely acquire (directly or indirectly) as… [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 6:01 am by David A. Martin
The central part of the 117-page opinion,  captioned Texas v. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 2:19 pm by Keith Mallinson
As previously remarked in IP Finance, I recently submitted my individual comments, and commented along with other scholars of law, business and economics, among hundreds of consultation submissions in response to the US Department of Justice’s ‘Draft Policy Statement on Licensing Negotiations and Remedies for Standard-Essential Patents Subject to Voluntary F/RAND Licensing Commitments’ (”DoJ Draft Revised Statement”).Red herring, courtesy of Wikimedia CommonsComments on… [read post]