Search for: "POST v. STATE"
Results 541 - 560
of 98,686
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2013, 4:09 pm
Ryan, which holds that ineffective assistance of counsel in state post-conviction proceedings--with regard to claims that could not be raised on direct appeal--excuses the defendant’s failure to raise such claims in the state post-conviction proceedings, and therefore allows him to raise them for the first time in a subsequent federal habeas proceeding. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:09 pm
Ryan, which holds that ineffective assistance of counsel in state post-conviction proceedings--with regard to claims that could not be raised on direct appeal--excuses the defendant’s failure to raise such claims in the state post-conviction proceedings, and therefore allows him to raise them for the first time in a subsequent federal habeas proceeding. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 6:47 am
The post NADIRAH MORENO v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 6:49 am
The post TRAVIS BURROUGHS v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 12:58 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 6:35 am
The post TROY RUSH v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 6:38 am
The post SEAN CALLENDER v. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 5:58 am
The post XAVIER FARMER v. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 6:21 am
The post DENNIS EDMONDS v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 1:10 pm
The post LEROY ANTONIO AUSTIN v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 6:15 am
The post JAYMON SIMPSON v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 6:36 am
The post KENNETH GROVES v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:12 pm
The post VERNON COX v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 6:13 am
The post WILLIAM BATES v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm
The question in this case is whether Congress’s 2006 decision to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution.To discuss the case, we have Michael Carvin, who is a Partner at Jones Day.- See more at:… [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm
The question in this case is whether Congress’s 2006 decision to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution.To discuss the case, we have Michael Carvin, who is a Partner at Jones Day.- See more at:… [read post]
9 May 2019, 2:00 am
The post Myers v United States Holds President Can Remove Executive Branch Officials appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
18 Nov 2017, 6:46 pm
As part of its ongoing Supreme Court series, the American University Washington College of Law Program on Information Justice & Intellectual Property will be hosting a post-argument discussion on the Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 11:07 am
The post State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 5:04 pm
State of New Jersey v. [read post]
