Search for: "Pace v. United States" Results 541 - 560 of 984
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2014, 4:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s 1974 decision in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 2:40 pm by Jason Rantanen
Pace, The Case for a Federal Trade Secrets Act, 8 Harv. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 4:27 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court held in Fifth Third Bank v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 2:23 am
Wyndham Worldwide Corp., et al., Defendants, Civil Action No. 13-1887 (ES), United States District Court, D. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 2:23 am
Wyndham Worldwide Corp., et al., Defendants, Civil Action No. 13-1887 (ES), United States District Court, D. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Court actually has said very little in the nearly fourteen months since its five-to-four decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 12:03 pm
Numerous states, northern and southern, banned interracial marriage at the time the amendment was adopted, and the Supreme Court unanimously endorsed the constitutionality of anti-miscegenation laws in Pace v. [read post]
Every year now, there are approximately 50,000 SWAT raids in the United States, according to Professor Pete Kraska of Eastern Kentucky University's School of Justice Studies. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 1:37 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The starting point in that cycle was the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 9:37 am by Gene Quinn
The PTO backlog of unexamined patent applications is less than 620,000 which is down from more than 750,000 in 2009 (a 17.3 percent decrease)… On a cynical note, I will observe that reducing the backlog will become much easier for the USPTO, as will meeting pendency goals, based upon the United States Supreme Court’s breathtaking decision in Alice v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Reprinted here, the Southern Manifesto formally stated opposition to the landmark United State Supreme Court decision Brown v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 7:02 pm
Quinn -(1) Whether a state may, consistent with the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, compel personal care providers to accept and financially support a private organization as their exclusive representative to petition the state for greater reimbursements from its Medicaid programs; and (2) whether the lower court erred in holding that the claims of providers in the Home Based Support Services Program are not ripe for judicial… [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 7:00 am by Tara Hofbauer
He shared Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins’ statement in the 9/11 case United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:33 am by Amy Howe
United States and Perez v. [read post]