Search for: "Pacer System"
Results 541 - 560
of 917
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
Lee, a graduate student for Princeton's Center for Information Technology Policy, recently published the results of a study he conducted into litigants' failure to adequately redact sensitive documents before uploading them to the various Court PACER systems. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 9:00 pm
Federal court filings are available on the PACER docketing system, which anybody may access by registering and paying under a dime per document page. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:19 am
Pay My Costs - http://tinyurl.com/3gzlgy3 (Doug Austin) Encrypted and Hidden Files Put eDiscovery at Risk - http://tinyurl.com/3dh9ruj (Bill Tolson) FTC Announces Update to Online Advertising Guidelines -http://tinyurl.com/3e84638 (Jenna Greene) No Shirt, No Complaint, No Subpoena - http://tinyurl.com/43mk7q4 (Josh Gilliland) NY Appellate Division Affirms Spoliation Sanctions - http://tinyurl.com/3hncg4b (Christopher Daze One Privileged E-Mail in a Chain Does Not Protect All, Judge Rules -… [read post]
31 May 2011, 6:18 am
He cautioned that Princeton’s Pacer documents aren’t a random sample, so it’s difficult to estimate just how many Pacer documents have similar problems. [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:30 am
Tim Lee has done a study of redaction failures using a nice-sized subset of the federal PACER database. [read post]
25 May 2011, 2:52 pm
The federal judiciary's PACER system offers the public online access to hundreds of millions of court records. [read post]
25 May 2011, 2:52 pm
The federal judiciary's PACER system offers the public online access to hundreds of millions of court records. [read post]
25 May 2011, 2:52 pm
The federal judiciary's PACER system offers the public online access to hundreds of millions of court records. [read post]
20 May 2011, 4:30 am
Cal. 2007) (Sorry, the 9th Circuit did not make this decision available on PACER). [read post]
15 May 2011, 2:49 pm
Though many bemoan the expense and terrible functionality of PACER, the federal government’s electronic docketing system, it is vastly superior to existing state alternatives. [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:36 pm
The CM/ECF system is technically part of PACER, but it’s not a central database: it runs separately for each court. [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:36 pm
The CM/ECF system is technically part of PACER, but it’s not a central database: it runs separately for each court. [read post]
9 May 2011, 11:57 am
This should prove to be a much better format than the PACER system that served as a poor interface for Federal Court decisions in the past. [read post]
5 May 2011, 11:12 am
The decisions are to be made available through the Government Printing Office (GPO)’s FDsys system. [read post]
5 May 2011, 6:03 am
Government Printing Office (GPO) and the Federal Judiciary have launched a one-year pilot program to offer federal court decisions via Federal Digital System, FDsys.Through FDsys you are able to search, browse, access and download government documents.For now the courts participating in the pilot include:U.S. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:49 am
Free access to opinions in all federal courts is currently available via the judiciary’s Public Access to Court Electronic Records service (PACER). [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 2:00 pm
At that time, it was an amazing feat to have an account system, a payment system, and basic file uploads. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 11:10 pm
The inputs identified by the model include digital collections of publicly available legal information, such as PACER / RECAP data, and other data discussed in connection with the Law.gov legal open government data project. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 12:35 pm
” Huh, maybe they could dip into that PACER surplus. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 12:35 pm
Huh, maybe they could dip into that PACER surplus. [read post]
