Search for: "Park v State of New York" Results 541 - 560 of 2,003
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2019, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse surveys the array of abortion-related cert petitions seeking Supreme Court review, observing that “[r]ed states are competing with one another to enact abortion restrictions that, while flagrantly unconstitutional under current law, could provide opportunities for the newly composed Supreme Court to reopen the issue. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 9:46 am by Eugene Volokh
New York was one of the few states that banned all private possession of stun guns; Friday's decision by U.S. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 10:42 am by Joy Waltemath
” The employee then filed a sexual harassment complaint with the New York State Division of Human Rights. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Courts may not interfere with an administrative tribunal's proper exercise of its discretionMatter of Seebald v New York State Div. of Human Rights and Roswell Park Cancer Inst. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Courts may not interfere with an administrative tribunal's proper exercise of its discretionMatter of Seebald v New York State Div. of Human Rights and Roswell Park Cancer Inst. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
From 2006 through 2018, plaintiffs honored the forbearance agreements while WOH “guided the project through . . . the APA permit, Town of Tupper Lake rezoning and subdivision approvals, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation permits, United States Army Corps of Engineers permits, and New York State Attorney General approvals” (Henry Aff., ¶ 5). [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
At Fox News, Caleb Parke reports that the court’s decision in The American Legion v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 2:27 pm by Amy Howe
And that is exactly what happened here: New York created the public-access channels and has opted to have them run on a “first-come, first-served basis. [read post]
16 Feb 2019, 9:51 am by Ilya Somin
But New Jersey courts have, under their state constitution, nonetheless imposed tighter limitations on the use of eminent domain than is the case in some other states, such as neighboring New York. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 9:58 am by Kevin Kaufman
States which use separate (rather than combined) reporting and nevertheless seek to tax GILTI face a serious constitutional challenge, particularly under the precedent of Kraft v. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 9:46 am by Andrew Delaney
I did see the Chairboy of the Board sing “New York, New York” at Belmont Park once. [read post]