Search for: "Park v. Powers"
Results 541 - 560
of 2,207
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2016, 6:10 am
See, Old Port Cove Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
In last week’s post, we explored how the case of Adnan Syed serves as a powerful vehicle to teach Strickland v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 10:00 pm
Part I: Introduction Part II: Circuit Judges Part III: County Judges Part IV: School Board, District 6 Part V: Miami-Dade County Charter Amendments (today) [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 11:56 am
Jam v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 11:21 am
In a 1977 ruling, in Wooley v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 11:06 am
Imagine you parked your car in a parking lot, and you later came back and found someone underneath your car just hanging out. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 2:31 pm
V. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
Pioneer Parking Lot, Inc, [501 S.W.2d 569]; Dispeker v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 7:40 am
GM’s offerings include the Tahoe Police Pursuit Vehicle, rated for 16 m.p.g. city and 23 m.p.g. highway, and the Caprice Police Pursuit Vehicle, rated for 18 m.p.g. city and 26 m.p.g. highway with a V-6 engine, less than that for the V-8). [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 3:00 am
” The law follows the recent 7th Circuit case of International Union of Operating Engineers Local 399 v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
See Maranto v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 10:52 am
MASON V. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 3:04 am
” Lake Region Packing Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:33 am
In KC, Bean J noted that in Al-Amoudi v Kifle[2011] EWHC 2037 (QB) in July 2011 Judge Parkes QC said that the practical ceiling for libel damages was perhaps £230-£240,000. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 2:20 pm
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 8:45 pm
The case of McDonald, et al., v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 4:00 am
(Fortunately, Hiibel v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 1:30 pm
Chicago Park District was a survival and wrongful death action arising from a decedent’s fall in the snow-and-ice covered parking lot of a city-owned recreational facility. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 1:18 pm
That ruling also focused on the non-intrusive nature of the GPS device and the fact that it was battery-powered and did not utilize the car’s power system; did not affect its driving qualities or carrying capacity or even alter the vehicle’s appearance. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 10:18 am
That ruling also focused on the non-intrusive nature of the GPS device and the fact that it was battery-powered and did not utilize the car’s power system; did not affect its driving qualities or carrying capacity or even alter the vehicle’s appearance. [read post]
