Search for: "People v Court"
Results 541 - 560
of 61,620
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2012, 12:53 pm
I thought the Court might grant review in Plancich v. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 6:00 am
In Capitol People First v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 2:30 am
People pouring in. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 4:49 pm
The Court of Appeal says: No. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
People ex rel. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 1:35 pm
On Nov. 23, the Trump administration filed petitions for a writ of certiorari before judgment in three lawsuits challenging its ban on military service by transgender people, preempting rulings by the courts of appeals. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:03 pm
The court on Monday said a federal appeals court acted too quickly in throwing out the death sentence for Michael Bies, after the Supreme Court barred execution of mentally retarded people in 2002. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 2:02 pm
The court also discussed the Backpage v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 1:40 pm
Later, in a second petition for state postconviction relief, Cone raised the claim that the State had violated Brady v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 2:18 pm
Supreme Court’s 1979 decision of Smith v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 7:12 pm
D.C. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
In People v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 5:31 am
Twitter v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 11:11 am
I'd have liked the California Supreme Court to at least address the policy consequences of its decision here.Seems to me that one consequence of this holding is to deter people in an emergency from calling 911. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 10:32 am
James V. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 8:41 pm
photo from an unrelated press conference at the SPC As discussed in two blogposts in 2018, the Supreme People’s Court (SPC) has a yearly plan for drafting judicial interpretations, as set out in its 2007 regulations on judicial interpretation work. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 8:41 pm
Company Law Interpretation (V) (Issued in late April, text found here, official commentary here). [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 1:37 pm
” The trial court allowed the People to reopen and Weber testified that, since her prior testimony, she had come to believe the ammunition could potentially be buckshot. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 1:17 pm
In People v Adams (53 NY2d 241 [1981]) the Court of Appeals held that evidence of an unnecessarily suggestive police-arranged identification of a criminal suspect must be suppressed as a matter of State constitutional law. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 2:05 pm
Or even, after the Court of Appeal's partial reversal, a decade-plus. [read post]
