Search for: "People v Denis"
Results 541 - 560
of 15,949
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2016, 8:35 am
It stated that setting the income figure significantly higher than even the £13,400 gross annual wage identified by the Migration Advisory Committee as the lowest maintenance threshold effectively denied many people the ability to join their foreign spouses, frustrating the rights of refugees and British citizens to live with their chosen partner. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 10:39 am
In People v. [read post]
8 Sep 2024, 2:00 pm
(People v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:08 am
In Washington v Trump, the 9th circuit court of appeals declined to grant a stay of the federal district court’s order. [read post]
10 May 2018, 10:31 am
Illinois, an 1873 decision upholding Illinois’ ability to deny law licenses to women, and Justice John Marshall Harlan, who dissented from Plessy v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 4:45 am
Shabahang, 484 Mich 156 (2009) (see our previous post here); remanded People v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 8:37 am
In Capitol Records v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 9:26 am
(People v Agee, 57 AD3d 1486, 1487, lv denied 12 NY3d 813; see People v Becoats, 71 AD3d 1578, 1579, affd 17 NY3d 643, cert denied ___ US ___, 132 S Ct 1970; People v Cobb, 72 AD3d 1565, 1565-1566, lv denied 15 NY3d 803). [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:56 am
Last week, a California magistrate judge denied federal prosecutors’ application for a search warrant on the grounds that law enforcement cannot force people to unlock their phones using biometric features, such as fingerprints and facial recognition. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 8:03 pm
People v Jeffries, 129 AD2d 962). [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 4:53 pm
Even assuming, arguendo, that the court advised defendant of the scheduled trial date and warned him that the trial would proceed in his absence if he failed to appear (see generally People v Parker, 57 NY2d 136, 141), we conclude that the court failed to inquire into defendant’s absence and to recite “on the record the facts and reasons it relied upon in determining that defendant’s absence was deliberate” (People v Brooks, 75 NY2d 898, 899, mot to amend… [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 4:53 pm
Even assuming, arguendo, that the court advised defendant of the scheduled trial date and warned him that the trial would proceed in his absence if he failed to appear (see generally People v Parker, 57 NY2d 136, 141), we conclude that the court failed to inquire into defendant’s absence and to recite “on the record the facts and reasons it relied upon in determining that defendant’s absence was deliberate” (People v Brooks, 75 NY2d 898,… [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 12:34 pm
Trump (4th Cir.) and Hawaii v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
People v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 6:38 am
In Vanderhoff v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 2:34 pm
Hopefully, the Fourth Department's recent decision in People v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 10:46 am
Peake, et al. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 11:15 am
He is correct; they are not rational justifications for denying gays and lesbians the right to marry. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 pm
In Dobson v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 6:29 am
Kraft and State v. [read post]
