Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,807
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm
In defining that test, the Supreme Court in Joseph relied heavily on the decision of the House of Lords of Kemsley v Foot [1952] A.C. 345. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 4:00 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The case, Yemshaw v. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 4:05 pm
Evidence was given at the trial that the VPR would have been circulated to not more than 150 people. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 6:17 am
Ignatius Yordan Nugraha, Strasbourg Observers: Consolidating the legal recognition and protection of same-sex couples: Koilova and Babulkova v Bulgaria. [read post]
9 May 2010, 3:06 am
For example, in Georgian Labour Party v Georgia, at para 155 the Court said: The Court does not rule out that the applicant party, as a legal entity (see Russian Conservative Party of Entrepreneurs and Others, cited above, § 102, and Kommersant Moldovy v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 10:11 am
From Michigan Supreme Court Justice Bridget McCormack's majority opinion (for four of the seven Justices) delivered Thursday in People v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 12:14 am
In EI Du Pont Nemours & Co v United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office [2009] EWCA Civ 966, dated 17 September 2009 but only recently made publicly available (see the SPC blog for more), the Honourable Lord Justice Jacob writes:"Under the SPC scheme an SPC has to be applied for in each Member State where it is wanted - there is no central scheme. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 2:39 am
Lord Justice Toulson made short work of this first argument. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Woodrow v Johansson, heard 19 January 2012 (HHJ Parkes QC) Miller v Associated Newspapers heard 21 to 25 May 2012 (Sharp J) SKA v CRH, heard 10 and 11 July 2012 (Nicola Davies J) Lord Ashcroft v Foley heard 20 July 2012 (Eady J) [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:48 pm
As Lord Justice Goldring said: "12. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm
[para 12] On the context of s.89, the doctrine of survivorship was consistent with the way Part IV of the Housing Act 1985 worked, as described by Lord Hoffman in Birmingham City Council v Walker [2007] UKHL 22. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm
[para 12] On the context of s.89, the doctrine of survivorship was consistent with the way Part IV of the Housing Act 1985 worked, as described by Lord Hoffman in Birmingham City Council v Walker [2007] UKHL 22. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:34 am
Lord Kerr (for the minority) noted that REP was the “touchstone” of private life (applying Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457). [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm
Lord Kerr (for the minority) noted that REP was the “touchstone” of private life (applying Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457). [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 12:31 am
Chester West and Chester Council v. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm
A Petition entitled “Exploiting People in the Public Eye” has been launched demanding new and stricter laws to safeguard people in the public eye and has attracted over 150,000 signatures. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:12 pm
As Lord Mansfield said in 1769, in the case of R. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 4:18 pm
In Caparo v Dickman Lord Bridge cautioned against discussing duties of care in abstract terms divorced from factual context: “It is never sufficient to ask simply whether A owes B a duty of care. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:26 pm
People held in prisons are one thing. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 7:13 am
In times of plenty, people avoid going to court and spend their time making money through commercial exploitation. [read post]
