Search for: "People v McDonald" Results 541 - 560 of 882
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2012, 9:29 am by Alfred Brophy
Command, a 1925 Michigan decision that upheld the state's sterilization statute, Justice McDonald emphasized the costs to the community: "That they [the people to be sterilized] are a serious menace to society no one will question. [read post]
21 May 2012, 7:19 am by Jim Gerl
Today the high court is hearing arguments in the case of McDonald v the City of Chicago case that questions whether the Second Amendment is incorporated into the due process clause or the privileges or immunities clause of the fourteenth amendment, thus invalidating the city's handgun ban. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:30 pm
 On one hand, two years ago, in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 1:37 pm by SJM
Footnote The ECHR has recently posed questions to the parties in the controversial night-time care case of McDonald v UK, namely: 1. [read post]
14 May 2012, 1:37 pm by SJM
Footnote The ECHR has recently posed questions to the parties in the controversial night-time care case of McDonald v UK, namely: 1. [read post]
8 May 2012, 10:27 am
Anyone who has taught Constitutional Law — like me or the President of the United States — is familiar with the way Chief Justice John Marshall used it in Cohens v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:29 pm by Sam Murrant
This case is briefly commented on by Ian McDonald, writing for Liberty, who considers the decision a vindication of the right to free speech – that people should, in a democratic society, be allowed to voice even insulting opinions without fear of reprisal. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 12:34 pm by Philip Thomas
People aren't going to want to bring their families in the McDonald's if a drunk homeless looking man is making a scene over drink re-fills. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 11:44 am by Thom Cooper
However, when it comes to laws regarding estate planning people often become overwhelmed with the prospect of protecting their estate and many times just say “Let the kids deal with it”. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:22 am by Nick Armstrong, Matrix
  The court in McDonald wondered whether they should have been invited to return to the source of the problem, which is R v Gloucestershire CC ex p Barry [1997] AC 584. [read post]